Jump to content

Talk:Ella Fitzgerald

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GenQuest (talk | contribs) at 04:34, 28 February 2022 (OneClickArchiver archived Birthdate to Talk:Ella Fitzgerald/Archive 1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Chungs91.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy References

I have restored cultural references from 3rd Rock, Fresh Prince, and Family Guy that were deleted. While they are silly (and some a little strange), they are nonetheless cultural references which show Ms. Fitzgerald's impact on American culture. If you feel that these references should be separated from the tribute albums, perhaps a separate section for those albums should be added. 68.43.45.250 17:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC) haha funny —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.63.230.4 (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Tone in the first part

I just read the article, and it seems to me that the first part is in a too dark tone for a biographical article... User:84.72.92.144

The story of Ella's early years may be quite dark, but not to tell them would be to over look the tragedy in her life, and would discard an essential part of the Ella Fitzgerald 'legend' Gareth E Kegg 23:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read that Fitzgerald was abused (beaten) at the home she was sent to as well. That's why she ran away. She also said later in life that the suffering she'd endured brought depth to her music. Why is this not stated in the "early years" section? It seems very important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.105.146 (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life - marriages

I transplanted some text from Ray Brown (musician) because, oddly, he was not mentioned here as her husband. The article states she was married twice or three times but there is only information about Brown and the alleged secret marriage. Can a subject matter expert add information about the third gentleman? Also, Brown's article states that the two divorced in 1952 and this article states 1953. Which is correct? Otto4711 00:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I readded the personal life section as it was before it was mangled, Stuart Nicholson's biography on Ella states 1953 as her divorce date, so I'll go with that. Gareth E Kegg 01:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations

The quotes sections ought to be properly sourced and shifted to Wikiquote in accordance with WP:NOT#DIR. --Muchness 11:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous rv

Apologies, done in error. Mutt Lunker 16:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborations with Bing Crosby

For the album, "Bing Crosby With Ella Fitzgerald & Peggy Lee," Ella sang 25 songs with Bing Crosby. There is the possibility that this could be 2--or three--separate albums combined for re-release (the Christmas song seem out of place), but I think that the songs, along with her tv appearances with him, merit his inclusion in the Collaborations section. ~ 19 May 2007

These are radio recordings, not studio recordings intended for an album release. Perhaps we should start a Radio section? Gareth E Kegg 12:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ColePorterSongbook.jpg

Image:ColePorterSongbook.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Legends

I just watched the episode about Ella in the Legends series on BBC Four. They said some things that aren't mentioned here like that her mother died of a heart attack, not in a traffic accident. And like how she used to have it written in to her contracts when she sang in the still segregated Southern States that her concerts mustn't be segregated. Also that she used a lot of her money to support projects for disadvantaged youngsters so that they have a better start in life than she did. See review in The Guardian -- SteveCrook (talk) 07:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've reinstated the correct death of Ella's mother, after it was changed so many times. The segregation boycott was more of Norman Granzs idea, I think we should have an expanded section on their relationship. The disadvantaged youngsters info should be here...Gareth E Kegg (talk) 16:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations & References

See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags Nhl4hamilton (talk) 10:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU ELLA FITZGERALD21:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)21:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)~~CARLAVIL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.128.246 (talk) ella fitzergerald was a heart singer and sings her heart out so props to ella fitzergerald !!!!!!!!!!! by lovely in your eyez

Ella Fitzgerald droped out of school when she was 15 years old and in the 10th grade. Her friend said she was born in 1920 Fitzgerald said she was born in 1917 to get into show buiness eariler. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.132.144 (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, besides all the ridiculous postings above, I think many of the quotations within the article took out words without properly indicating it. If you do that within a direct quotation, you should put it in square brackets. The words removed should also be replaced by an ellipsis and not 4 or however many periods are in there. Someone should check out all of these direct quotations and see if that's how the speakers are quoted or if things were really omitted. Mabsal (talk) 06:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo

I love the photo in the infobox, but --am I not right in believing that Wikipedia policy is to show the most recent available free-image in the infobox, and then, in the biography pages, gravitate from the earliest one on down chronologically with the dates in the text, ending again, with another of the last photos? I add photos to Wikipedia; these days I'm easily spending about 1/4 of all my time with it in finding, (and convincing) photographers to release their pics to us through Creative Commons to Wikimedia Commons. I've had several excellent photos taken from the infoboxes because they were not the most recent. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 16:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bits that don't make sense to me

I'm making some minor changes right now, but the last paragraph in "The Decca years" section doesn't make sense to me. Can someone familiar with the subject clarify? Mabsal (talk) 03:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Also, in the Verve section there is a sentence about the booking being instrumental to her success, but fails to clarify exactly why that was. This should be expanded if this tidbit is true, or the sentence removed. Mabsal (talk) 05:03, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Another: In the Later life section, there is no criteria given for why the Pablo records were her "best ever," especially considering the list of problems listed right after! I mean, did they sell the best regardless or what? Mabsal (talk) 05:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Pan American Racism inicident

I just found this In 1954 Ella was forbidden to come to Australia in Honolulu becuase she was African American http://digitalvaults.org/#/detail/3473/?record=3473 I can not judge whether this is important to this article Wakelamp (talk) 12:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Ella's mother.

The definitive biography of Ella Fitzgerald (ISBN 9780575400320, Pg 14.) by Stuart Nicholson states "Then, without warning in early 1932, the hardworking Tempe had a heart attack and died suddenly. She was just thirty-eight. Ella has claimed that her mother died from injuries sustained when trying to save a child from being run down by a car. Neither Charles Gulliver nor Annette Miller (Ella's childhood friends) has any knowledge of this"

I am wary of relying on the "official" biographies of celebrities. In further credit to Nicholson, it was he who established that Ella was born in 1917, not 1918, this has now become commonly accepted. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recordings with Chick Webb's orchestra

The final sentence included a partial quote of the source (the New York Times obit, still available today) but added an implication about Ella's first recording that the source did not (it was a novelty, but not 'disposable pop fluff'. I've removed that part and replaced it with a more complete and representative quotation and rewritten the section a little. Some of the words are only the opinion of whoever wrote the obituary, but they are what they are. Twistlethrop (talk) 16:17, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revisited this and the source, and rewrote the last sentence to include mention of the source and improve obvious NPOV.Twistlethrop (talk) 21:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citation on range

Added citation from NYT obit on her vocal range, but it documents the breadth of the range in octaves, not the specific low to high notes. Some music student get out there and find one more specific, please. Here.it.comes.again (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC) I[reply]


Lead section

One should not tag the "lead section is not good" and not put a note here to say what you do not like about it. Is it just too short for you? What do you think is missing? Please reply, or the tag will be removed. Telecine Guy 20:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

I added the tag. I'd like to clarify that the tag is not "lead section is not good", the current lead is good writing but it needs to be expanded. The lead is far too short for an article of this length and does not provide an adequate overview of her career. The lead is four sentences, and does not really say much. If you read the lead, you will find out she had a three octave voice and a brief description of her vocal abilities, was a notable interpreter of the Great American Songbook, sold 40 million copies of her 70-plus albums, and some of her awards. No mention of collaborations with Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington, no mention of hit singles, no mention of her film and television roles, no mention of Verve or Decca Record labels. There's a lot that can and should be added. I'm not really a writer, and I'm not too familiar with her career, so I have not attempted to expand the lead yet. I have sourced a lot of the information in the article though. Let's work together and improve this article. Melonkelon (talk) 21:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for the reply, very helpful, I thought you may have an idea on what you did not like (missing) from the lead. Telecine Guy 15:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Lead section assignment

I further expanded the lead for an assignment part of this course. I made sure to touch on more key points and added more content to the lead to fit the article's length. Agunth2 (talk) 15:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's good. I think it's definitely been improved. It's important to note that her surname should be used rather than her given name, see WP:SURNAME. Also, per WP:CONTRACTIONS, contractions should be avoided (use was not instead of wasn't). Melonkelon (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ella Fitzgerald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Seems like this page is always showing up in my watchlist for vandalism. Can it be semi-protected? Rosekelleher (talk) 11:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ella Fitzgerald/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

needs inline citations and cleanup plange 23:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 14:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Nicholson

Stuart Nicholson is not Stuart Nicholson, the former professional footballer, he is the Visiting Professor at Leeds College of Music who has "written seven books on jazz which have been translated into thirteen languages. They include biographies of Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald and Duke Ellington and critically acclaimed overviews of jazz that include Jazz-Rock: A History, Jazz: The 1980s Resurgence, Is Jazz Dead (Or Has It Moved to a New Address)? and Jazz and Culture in a Global Age" : [1]. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

I noticed that the introduction mentions her "horn-like" improvisational abilities "particularly in her scat singing". I don't mean to split hairs here, but since her voice was her primary instrument, wouldn't it make more sense to omit the word "particularly"? LMJohnston116 (talk) 14:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It highlights improvisation during scat singing over (let's call it) non-scat singing. EddieHugh (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tributes and legacy section

A template in this section reads, "This section is missing information about the impacts and influences of Ms Fitzgerald and her music on other artists, on the later history of music, and on society." I'm unconvinced such information belongs in an encyclopedia which tries to be impartial by concentrating on facts. I don't know why it is necessary or desirable to include such grandiose, subjective, and debatable speculation as "imacts[sic]" and "influences[sic]" "of Ms[sic] Fitzgerald and her music on other artists, on the later[sic] history of music, and on society." That sounds like an imprecise invitation to write long opinions. That's the opposite of Wikipedia's modest purpose.
Vmavanti (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vmavanti, thank you. I entirely agree and especialy this article does not need to be defaced with an unneeded maintenace tag. I am removing it; if anyone wants to add appropriate content, it is permissible to attempt to improve any article; please just do not tag. Thanks and all the best, Fylbecatulous talk 20:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]