This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Witherwingsblog.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 7 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dylan12899.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sage Early.
Within the rules for a Wikipedia article, (I'm not very familiar with these yet), I'd like to see more material on this page to inform those wanting to get involved in transgender activism what they could do for the cause. This may just be accomplished by external &/or internal links, &/or further content in the article itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deluno (talk • contribs) 11:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Requested move 21 May 2016
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Remove the celebrities from the In popular culture section
The fact that a group like HRC listed a bunch of celebrities in support of TG rights, just isn't relevant for this article, imho, unless they've done something. A lot of people have sent a check—should they all be listed, too? I'm inclined to delete the entire list, starting with "Archie Panjabi" and ending with "Lana Wachowski" (herself TG) unless it can be shown they have some relevance or impact to the rights movement. Jill Soloway, not even listed here, has had an impact; not sure what Brad Pitt has done other than send a check; ditto just about everybody else in that list. Mathglot (talk) 06:57, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you on this. I think changing the "In Popular Culture" section entirely to something like "Notable Figures" who are within the Trans umbrella might be more meaningful to this page. For now, I would like to add Janet Mock to this section (for an assignment), but maybe we can make a new list entirely in the near future? I'm new to Wikipedia, but I would love to see more done on this page. Aasuka (talk) 22:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Setbacks and opponents
Transgender rights movement doesn't always move forward; it has reverses, setbacks, and groups fighting against them, just like any movement, and the story of those events and the groups in opposition to the tg movement are part of the story here, too. Certainly people like Janice Raymond, Germaine Greer, J. Michael Bailey, various fundamental religious groups, anti-social justice groups like the Pacific Justice Institute who fight against transgender rights, and other such opponents of tg rights should be included.
I removed the Terminology section in this edit. There wasn't a single term in the bunch, that had any relevance to the Transgender rights movement; they were all general times that would make more sense in the Transgender or Transphobia article, but those articles have already got it covered, and more. There's no need for such a section in this article, so I removed it. Mathglot (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Raid on Crow Nation
The paragraph about the raid on the Crow Nation doesn't seem to have anything to do with this article. Possibly it could be moved to another article, so saving it here:
Idealized illustration of "Pine Leaf", possibly identified with Woman Chief, from James Beckwourth's autobiography In the 1820s Rocky Mountains, a raid[by whom?] on a village of the Crow Nation resulted in the death of a young man; his sibling, Pine Leaf, vowed that she would never marry until she had killed a hundred of her enemies. Pine Leaf was recognized by her tribe as two-spirit, a gender-variant individual who may have spiritual gifts and the potential for authority and leadership in the community. She served in numerous war parties, and legend has it that one man, Jim Beckwourth, a former slave, asked for her hand in marriage. She immediately declined, but upon being pressed further she responded that she would marry him just as soon as the pine leaves turn yellow.[1][2]
References
^Edwin T. Denig: Five Indian Tribes at the Upper Missouri, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 1961, p. 195–200
^Jenkins, Jennifer L. (2001). "Woman Chief". In Bataille, Gretchen M.; Lisa, Laurie (eds.). Native American Women: A Biographical Dictionary. Routledge. p. 341. ISBN1135955875. Retrieved January 12, 2014.
The article as it currently stands reads like activism. The article is in need of a complete overhaul and the language needs tightening up. I welcome input in best doing this. Sport and politics (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reform Judaism
A section was recently added to the article containing a cut-and-paste from a website. Besides the fact that this is too detailed, and a direct copy rather than a paraphrase with perhaps short quotations, it's not clear to me how this statement about Reform Judaism's declaration of principles, enlightened as they may be towards transgender people, has anything to do with the activist movement for trangender rights per se. Better content for this section would be, How did activists within Reform Judaism raise the topic of transgender rights, and how did they get the general assembly of Reform Judaism to consider the topic, draw up a document, and publish it? That would be a worthy addition to the article, but I'm not sure that simply parroting the document they ended up writing, is any improvement to the article. Perhaps a one- or two-sentence section, with a link to the web page, would be sufficient in the article.
The section removed from the article is below, should anyone care to work on it.
Section on Reform Judaism removed from article
Transgender Equality in Reform Judaism
The Reform Movement is committed to inclusion of transgender and gender non-conforming people. In 2003, Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion admitted its first openly transgender rabbinical student. In 2015, the Central Conference of American Rabbis’ updated its policies to require that congregations and other organizations seeking a rabbi commit to including in their search all candidates regardless of gender identity.
In 2015, the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism passed a resolution on transgender equality that:
1. Affirms its commitment to the full equality, inclusion and acceptance of people of all gender identities and expressions.
2. Affirms the right of transgender and gender non-conforming individuals to be referred to by their name, gender, and pronoun of preference.
3. Encourages Reform [institutions and individuals] to continue to advocate for the rights of people of all gender identities and gender expressions;
4. Urges the adoption and implementation of legislation and policies that prevent discrimination and require individuals to be treated equally under the law as the gender by which they identify.
5. Calls on the U.S. and Canadian governments to review and revise all laws and policies to ensure full equality and protections.
6. Urges Reform Movement institutions to begin or continue to work with local and national Jewish transgender, lesbian, gay and bisexual organizations.
7. Recommends Reform Movement institutions to ensure, to the extent feasible, the availability of gender-neutral restrooms.
8. Urges Reform Movement institutions to review their use of language in prayers, forms and policies to ensure people of all gender identities and gender expressions are welcomed, included, accepted and respected.
9. Collaborates with other Reform Movement institutions to create more inclusive and welcoming ritual, programmatic and educational materials. [1]
In the History section, the ninth paragraph starts with "In 1993, Adela Vázquez, a Latina transgender woman, protested for in San Francisco in consideration of the government removing the transgender community from the workforce because they labeled the trans community as disabled." I cannot parse what this sentence is saying, and unfortunately I don't have access to the source and can't find another one describing Vázquez's activism during this period. Does anyone know what this is supposed to mean? Frankly I think this whole section could use a rewrite, as right now it's not a very cohesive history but more of a laundry list of events, but this sentence is particularly confusing. SreySros (talk) 21:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Magnus Hirshfield
The sentence about Magnus Hirshfield is very vague and contains no real information. There are also no sources cited. This should probably be changed. Sage Early (talk) 06:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article is entirely one-sided from the perspective of those who support "transgender rights." Given the fact that the very validity of the "transgender" phenomenon is not accepted by large portions of the population (outside of privileged corners of majority-white countries), almost assuredly the majority of the world population, would the editors of this site be willing to accommodate a section of criticism on the activities and claims of transgender rights activists? 96.242.144.8 (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, In accordance with wikipedia´s policies, this article is written with equal and due weight to both sides of the topic. Please clarify what parts of this article you believe are not neutral? PerryPerryDTalk To Me20:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article as a whole is not neutral because only one viewpoint is presented; the entire article takes a positive tone towards the movement (unless you call positive quotations "neutral" because someone else said it). Now conversely, there is no criticism section in this oppositional article, but the ENTIRE article barely deviates from calling the movement incoherent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gender_movement I know enough about how Wikipedia's "neutrality" works at this point -- hence why I asked the simple question if a criticism section would be welcome. 96.242.144.8 (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's WP:NPOV core policy orients the treatment in our articles to the reliable sources on a topic (with deference to the highest-quality sources in particular). Do you have evidence suggesting that these articles do not reflect the views best-supported in quality sources? (As an example, more than 30% of Americans and perhaps a similar percentage globally believe that the earth is flat, according to opinion polls, but we do not present this as an alternative viewpoint with equal standing to the round-earth hypothesis.) Newimpartial (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, for example, this article contains a section on a letter signed by 2600 doctors against something the Trump administration said or did, but there is no discussion of the professionals who have come to the conclusion, based on sound evidence, that "transitioning" has a negative effect on the patient's treatment, such as the former chairman of psychiatry at John Hopkins University Paul R. McHugh. Would you consider the conclusions of such an individual unworthy of publication? 96.242.144.8 (talk) 20:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, morally speaking yes, theres a lot wrong with that. you have your right to your opinion, but so do I. Also by the way that you are talking and judging by your contributions history, you have shown clear violations of the Wikipedia Guidelines. PerryPerryDTalk To Me21:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So you tell me I have a moral obligation to support something which is gravely immoral, violates the Hippocratic oath by reducing positive outcomes in every metric after treatment, is against my religion and against nature, and completely against science and logic since sex is a biological reality and cannot be changed by any means... and you simultaneously pretend you and this article are neutral? I have no intention of proselytizing, only representing the other viewpoint. Your hypocrisy is ASTOUNDING. This entire article is written by supporters, probably many "transgenders" themselves -- fine, we should know what they think! You don't even want to understand the other side - label them immoral and silence them - just like ISIS, Nazis and Communists. Don't pretend to be unbiased when support is allowed and opposition is not. 96.242.144.8 (talk) 21:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Witherwingsblog.
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Transgender rights and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 13#Transgender rights until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. feminist (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)