Jump to content

Dan Froomkin

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 83d40m (talk | contribs) at 17:18, 13 June 2022 (added link to https://presswatchers.org/). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Dan Froomkin is the editor of Press Watch,[1] an independent website previously known as White House Watch.[2] He is a former senior writer and Washington editor for The Intercept. Prior to that, he was a writer and editor for The Huffington Post.[3][4]

Personal history and career

Froomkin was raised in Washington, D.C. In 1997, he joined washingtonpost.com, the relatively new online website of the Post, as a senior producer for politics. From 2001 to 2003, he was editor of washingtonpost.com. His column devoted to presidential accountability launched on January 12, 2004. In a career in journalism spanning more than two decades, he had worked at such newspapers as The Winston-Salem Journal, The Miami Herald, and The Orange County Register. He was a Michigan Journalism Fellow and editor of new media for Education Week.[5]

From 2004 to 2009, he wrote a highly successful column for the online version of The Washington Post entitled, White House Watch, and he was the senior Washington correspondent for the Huffington Post.[6] On June 18, 2009, it was reported that his blog would cease to exist and his employment at The Washington Post was terminated. In July, 2009, he was hired by the Huffington Post.

Froomkin subsequently worked as the Washington bureau chief for The Intercept, from September, 2014 until May, 2017. In September 2018, Froomkin revived White House Watch as an independent website.[2]

Froomkin's brother is University of Miami Law Professor Michael Froomkin, a prominent blogger who writes on Florida politics and the law.[citation needed]

Publications

From White House Briefing to White House Watch

In her editorial, "The Two Washington Posts", published on December 11, 2005, Washington Post Ombudsman Deborah Howell observes that the print newspaper The Washington Post and the website washingtonpost.com are two different entities; although "The Post Web site is owned by the Washington Post Co... it is not run by the newspaper. It is a separate company called Washington Post-Newsweek Interactive, or WPNI, with offices in Arlington."[7] Whereas "The Post provides the vast majority of the Web site's content... the Web site has its own staff of 65 editorial employees and its own features... [Moreover,] [t]here are cultural differences between the two newsrooms, which could be expected between a traditional newspaper and the more free-wheeling Web site... The two Posts interact every day... [but] political reporters at The Post don't like WPNI columnist Dan Froomkin's "White House Briefing", which is highly opinionated and liberal. They're afraid that some readers think that Froomkin is a Post White House reporter."[7]

Howell continued:

John Harris, national political editor at the print Post, said, "The title invites confusion. It dilutes our only asset—our credibility" as objective news reporters. Froomkin writes the kind of column "that we would never allow a White House reporter to write. I wish it could be done with a different title and display."
Harris is right; some readers do think Froomkin is a White House reporter. But Froomkin works only for the Web site and is very popular—and [Executive Editor of the website Jim] Brady is not going to fool with that, though he is considering changing the column title and supplementing it with a conservative blogger.
Froomkin said he is "happy to consider other ways to telegraph to people that I'm not a Post White House reporter. I do think that what I'm doing, namely scrutinizing the White House's every move—with an attitude—is in the best traditions of American and Washington Post journalism."
On the other hand, Chris Cillizza, a washingtonpost.com political reporter, appears in The Post frequently. When he writes for the paper, he works for Harris, who is happy to have him.[7]

There was some support from readers for Froomkin in editorial correspondence about the matter.[8]

On January 30, 2007, White House Briefing was renamed White House Watch.[citation needed]

Nieman Watchdog: Questions the press should ask

Froomkin was also the deputy editor of Nieman Watchdog: Questions the press should ask, a blog hosted by the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University that "seeks to encourage more informed reporting by soliciting probing questions from experts".[9]

Firing from the Washington Post

On June 18, 2009, it was reported that Froomkin was being fired by the Washington Post.[10][11] Froomkin confirmed this in a June 19 entry on White House Watch: "As Washington Post ombudsman Andy Alexander and others reported yesterday, The Washington Post has terminated my contract. So sometime in late June or early July, I'll be writing my last blog post here."[12]

Almost immediately, Froomkin was hired by the Huffington Post, where he continued to write and edit. His last original column for that publication was September 25, 2013.

He joined The Intercept on September 4, 2014. On May 9, 2017, The Intercept announced he was leaving. The Intercept's editor praised Froomkin upon his leaving, writing: "Dan was integral to The Intercept from the start, building up a scrappy and smart bureau from scratch and infusing our independent voice on politics with his skepticism, wisdom, and wit. Dan never wavered in his fierce commitment to the Intercept’s core mission of producing original accountability journalism.[13][3][14]

Revival of White House Watch

In September 2018, Froomkin revived White House Watch as an independent website.[2]

Presswatchers

On June 8, 2022, in her assertion that many do not understand that an "existential fight for rule of law" is at stake in the hearings of the Select Committee on the January 6 attack on the capitol, Heather Cox Richardson noted that in his publication, Presswatchers,[15] Froomkin had "explored how U.S. news organizations have failed to communicate to readers that we are on a knife edge between democracy and authoritarianism",[16] and noted his plea for journalists to "frame the events in the larger context of Republican attempts to overturn our democracy".

Notes

  1. ^ presswatchers.org
  2. ^ a b c Froomkin, Dan (September 2018). "About White House Watch". White House Watch.
  3. ^ a b "Dan Froomkin". The Intercept. Retrieved 2017-05-03.
  4. ^ Kate Myers (The Intercept). "First Look Media Works 2015 990". p. 9. Retrieved 2018-07-13.
  5. ^ "About White House Watch".
  6. ^ Dan Froomkin, "About White House Watch", 26 May 2004, accessed 27 April 2007
  7. ^ a b c Deborah Howell, "The Two Washington Posts" 11 Dec. 2005, accessed 27 Apr. 2007.
  8. ^ "Ombudsman 'Briefing'", Letter to the Editor, The Washington Post 17 Dec. 2005, accessed 27 Apr. 2007: A21. [Abstract; 484 words; online subscription or fee required for full text].
  9. ^ "About Washington Watch".
  10. ^ Salon - The Washington Post fires its best columnist. Why?, June 18, 2009
  11. ^ Politico - Dan Froomkin Fired, June 18, 2009
  12. ^ Froomkin, Dan (June 29, 2009). "Froomkin Watch". White House Watch. The Washington Post Company. Retrieved June 21, 2009.
  13. ^ "Ryan Grim to Head the Intercept's Washington Bureau". 9 May 2017.
  14. ^ Kate Myers (The Intercept). "First Look Media Works 2015 990". p. 9. Retrieved 2018-07-13.
  15. ^ presswatchers.org
  16. ^ Richardson, Heather Cox, [https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/june-8-2022, June 8, 2022, Letters from an American, Substack, June 9, 2022
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dan_Froomkin&oldid=1092954868"