Jump to content

Talk:The Peel Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ed1964 (talk | contribs) at 23:34, 8 July 2022 (→Fair use rationale for Image:Peellogo.gif: Archive bot comment on image file no longer being used on page.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

How many divisions?

This article says five, but lists six. The company's website says four, but lists five. Choalbaton (talk) 17:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Major Rewrite

In order to establish notability and include reliable third-party sources a major rewrite is required, I would be willing to initiate this and possibly complete it if no-one else is willing to participate,
James50567 (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Major Re-Write in progress, please bear with me whilst i undertake this task, the resultant article may be considerably smaller, but it will be better set out and contain more reliable references.
James50567 (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Peel Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2022 copy edit

Large sections of this article are out of date or are conflations of different periods, all misleadingly indicated as the present. It should be OK to not put a lot of "now" material into the article because peel do seem to be quite fluid and instead rely on a simple intro summary and bunging everything else into history with much reliance on underlying main articles.

I have broken the longer sections up and consigned much of the material to a history section. Many of the sections have main articles to link back to which I have put in place. Also, screeds of promotional material deleted. It should be possible to in many cases put the bare minimum here and rely on the main articles.

There are few adequate refs in place but many of the 'main articles' have good ones. to borrow.

I have no objections to anybody else picking up sections!

My intention has been to add something about the quoted investments in the intro.


Ed1964 (talk) 15:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That'll do from me for now. Hopefully there are plenty of slots to insert new information in now.Ed1964 (talk) 23:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Peel_Group&oldid=1097143133"