Jump to content

User talk:Proudly Indian09

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Proudly Indian09 (talk | contribs) at 05:07, 13 August 2022 (Blocked as a sockpuppet). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, Proudly Indian09, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Hi. I request you to share your thoughts at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium/archive1, which I nominated for featured list. If you find no issues in the article from your point of view, then please consider giving a Support. Thank you.  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 06:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to share your thoughts if you have enough time.?  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 09:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A.A Prinon:, already did it. Thank You.
Thank you too.  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 10:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sharjah aerial view 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sabyasachi Chakrabarty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raka (film director) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raka (film director), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Musicfaneditor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Musicfaneditor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Proudly Indian09 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear User:RoySmith I do not own multiple accounts nor I am associated with User:Musicfaneditor. You have mistakenly blocked me. Hence I request you to unblock me, or I have to raise complain against you for blocking me for sockpuppetry based on your assumption. Proudly Indian09 (talk) 09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not an assumption. It's based on evidence, which this request does not address. Every sock puppet says they aren't one, so that is insufficient. Even if you personally only have this account, that would make this meat puppetry. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Proudly Indian09 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

331dot & User:RoySmith I am reiterating that, I do not have any other accounts, nor I am associated with the abovementioned blocked user. If there is any similarities of contribution history between me and the blocked user, it is purely coincidence. Based on assumption I have been blocked. If you have proof that I am involved with the mentioned account, show me the evidence. Unless, I will raise complain against all those users who will decline my unblock request.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. I've also reblocked one of your other accounts that I unblocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are already free to review the SPI. You will have to do better than "it's not me" and "it's a coincidence" as all socks say that. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

331dot what kind of proof you need to prove myself of not being involved with User:Musicfaneditor? If you need proof then come to my country, face me off in the court. I will prove you that I am not involved with the mentioned account neither I am involved in any wrongdoing on Wikipedia. In reply, you have to face a harassment case for harassing me this way.