User talk:NeverTry4Me

CAN'T RETIRE

NeverTry4Me tried to leave Wikipedia, but found that they couldn't do so…

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Page views for this user's talk page over the last 30 days

Detailed statistics

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balikaria has been accepted

Balikaria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amayapur has been accepted

Amayapur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niz Bahjani has been accepted

Niz Bahjani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barsarkuchi has been accepted

Barsarkuchi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhapur Village has been accepted

Madhapur Village, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pub Kalakuchi has been accepted

Pub Kalakuchi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

It is not a good idea to remove normal, polite conversations as disruptive editing. You are always free to ignore messages on your talk pages, but incorrectly labelling them as disruptive is at least frowned upon. Please refrain from that. The Banner talk 10:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC) If you want, I can help you with setting up an archive-bot so all messages are archived instead of destroyed. That will keep your talk page clear.[reply]

@The Banner: The page is already automatically archived. 0xDeadbeef 12:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, overlooked that. The Banner talk 12:52, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gulgam has been accepted

Gulgam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rv of My Edits

I looked into it further, and I've seen that you actually requested to undelete the draft, not the original creator (this couldn't be seen in page history). Sorry for this mixup, all good now:) VickKiang (talk) 09:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mannan Wani

The {{db-author}} tag may normally only be used on pages where you are the only author/contributor, whereas this article was originally written by another user. However, in this instance, I will delete the page as an exception. Stifle (talk) 09:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Stifle thank you as the article is under WP:RECENT, I preferred not to continue as limited resource is available. _-✍NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 22:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for creating and improving Indian-related articles (P.S. apologies for my mistake on CSD). VickKiang (talk) 09:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VickKiang I love the Tea. Thanks a ton. _-✍NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 10:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and sorry again for the wrong CSD G7, I didn't check your request for undeletion. Thanks and have a nice day, depending on time zones, of course, :) VickKiang (talk) 10:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VickKiang I understand. There is nothing to tell me sorry, as the draft is reversed and available again for WP:REFUND. I guess we are on the same time zone. Actually the article is under WP:RECENT, I preferred not to continue as limited resource is available. May be after a couple of months, some resources will be available for the article. _-✍NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 22:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply! I understand later that the draft was undeleted because of your request, so your G7 deletion is perfectly fine. P.S for the time zones- it’s seven clock here, I’m not sure the time in your area, but nevertheless have a nice day:) VickKiang (talk) 22:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VickKiang It's about 4 AM. Indian time zone. :) _-✍NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 22:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Operation Bajrang.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Operation Bajrang.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Bankyntiewlang Lyngdoh has been accepted

George Bankyntiewlang Lyngdoh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 09:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talap Town has been accepted

Talap Town, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pari Gam Jagir has been accepted

Pari Gam Jagir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_signed,511KeV ^(talk) 13:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wailadmiki Shylla has been accepted

Wailadmiki Shylla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dwaipayan (talk) 00:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tumen, Sikkim has been accepted

Tumen, Sikkim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tail Wani has been accepted

Tail Wani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratekreel (talk) 08:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Ratekreel, can you please have a look at the drafts Draft:Baganpara Subdivision, Draft:Maneybung, Draft:Tekipora as per WP:GEOLAND ? _-✍NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 09:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see two of the drafts have been accepted and I am a bit busy these days. I'll take a look at Draft:Baganpara Subdivision if I get more free time in the coming days. Ratekreel (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardu Toru has been accepted

Hardu Toru, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magri Pora has been accepted

Magri Pora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––FormalDude (talk) 11:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tekipora has been accepted

Tekipora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––FormalDude (talk) 11:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maneybung has been accepted

Maneybung, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––FormalDude (talk) 11:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G Bidai has been accepted

G Bidai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––FormalDude (talk) 12:05, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devi Pora has been accepted

Devi Pora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghordi Khas has been accepted

Ghordi Khas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krewa Rampur has been accepted

Krewa Rampur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 10:42, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Majalta has been accepted

Majalta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zenith Sangma has been accepted

Zenith Sangma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Akevsharma (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurjinder Singh Suri has been accepted

Gurjinder Singh Suri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Semkhor movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Semkhor movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NT4M, you know (I hope) that I like you as a person. But I'm simply baffled by your decision to, with the consensus at AN slightly trending in your direction, resort to blatant personal attacks againt someone who had only !voted weak oppose—at a time when, given the topic at hand, your previous warning for personal attacks, when unblocked, was hopefully fresh in your mind. You have now gone against all three parts of your unblock conditions/warnings, and I've lost any faith that you are going to abide by them going forward, so I have made this an indefinite block. But, as noted in my block summary, if some admin disagrees and thinks that a tempblock could have a sufficient deterrent effect here, I have no objection to them downgrading.

I had really hoped that we could make this work, because I appreciate your contributions to the encyclopedia, and, again, think you're a generally nice person. But serial personal attacks cannot stand, and I feel my hands are tied here.

Given your response to my previous tempblock, I will say in advance that I do not intend to reply here unless asked to by a neutral third party.

I sincerely wish you the best of luck in whatever you do next in life. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

NeverTry4Me (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I truly understand that the block was rational. Knowingly or unknowingly I made a personal attack here which is really a shame. I was frustrated with the minimal participation in the consensus and I wrote something at the WP:AN which I shouldn't have as it was really disruptive, annoying, and led to this block. I also admit that I have hurt some users on Wiki. But I want to stay here. Let me stay here with topic bans like a no-entry at any pages that start with Wikipedia: and interacting with others through talk pages etc. Such bans would be a preventive measure to restrict me from further misconduct. My appeal for lifting the block should be considered under point 3 of WP:CONDUNBLOCK. _-✍NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 00:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I truly understand that the block was rational. Knowingly or unknowingly I made a personal attack [[Special:Diff/1109678052/1109685187|here]] which is really a shame. I was frustrated with the minimal participation in the consensus and I wrote something at the [[WP:AN]] which I shouldn't have as it was really disruptive, annoying, and led to this block. I also admit that I have hurt some users on Wiki. But I want to stay here. Let me stay here with topic bans like a no-entry at any pages that start with '''Wikipedia:''' and interacting with others through talk pages etc. Such bans would be a preventive measure to restrict me from further misconduct. My appeal for lifting the block should be considered under point 3 of [[WP:CONDUNBLOCK]]. <sub><span style="color:#2C5E1A;">-✍ </span></sub><span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(green, black)">NeverTry4Me⛅</span> [[User talk:NeverTry4Me|<span style="color:#2C5E1A; font-weight:bold"> C♯ </span>]] 00:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I truly understand that the block was rational. Knowingly or unknowingly I made a personal attack [[Special:Diff/1109678052/1109685187|here]] which is really a shame. I was frustrated with the minimal participation in the consensus and I wrote something at the [[WP:AN]] which I shouldn't have as it was really disruptive, annoying, and led to this block. I also admit that I have hurt some users on Wiki. But I want to stay here. Let me stay here with topic bans like a no-entry at any pages that start with '''Wikipedia:''' and interacting with others through talk pages etc. Such bans would be a preventive measure to restrict me from further misconduct. My appeal for lifting the block should be considered under point 3 of [[WP:CONDUNBLOCK]]. <sub><span style="color:#2C5E1A;">-✍ </span></sub><span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(green, black)">NeverTry4Me⛅</span> [[User talk:NeverTry4Me|<span style="color:#2C5E1A; font-weight:bold"> C♯ </span>]] 00:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I truly understand that the block was rational. Knowingly or unknowingly I made a personal attack [[Special:Diff/1109678052/1109685187|here]] which is really a shame. I was frustrated with the minimal participation in the consensus and I wrote something at the [[WP:AN]] which I shouldn't have as it was really disruptive, annoying, and led to this block. I also admit that I have hurt some users on Wiki. But I want to stay here. Let me stay here with topic bans like a no-entry at any pages that start with '''Wikipedia:''' and interacting with others through talk pages etc. Such bans would be a preventive measure to restrict me from further misconduct. My appeal for lifting the block should be considered under point 3 of [[WP:CONDUNBLOCK]]. <sub><span style="color:#2C5E1A;">-✍ </span></sub><span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(green, black)">NeverTry4Me⛅</span> [[User talk:NeverTry4Me|<span style="color:#2C5E1A; font-weight:bold"> C♯ </span>]] 00:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}