Talk:Japanese tree frog

Amphibians and Reptiles C‑class Low‑importance

	Japanese tree frog is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Flora and fauna C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:11, November 13, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Flora and fauna task force.

Photographs have been requested to improve this article's quality.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Found in Georgia

I live in North America, specifically the state of Georgia. Today I was outside hosing down my house and saw a frog on my porch. After a little research I matched it up with the picture and description of a Japanese Tree Frog.

Everything I've been able to read says that it is more common to Japan than to North America. So does anyone know if it is an unusual occurence to see one of these frogs, especially on your porch?

I should probably mention there are not a lot of trees in our neighborhood, and I don't live on a body of water. The closest water is at least 1000 meters away and the closest clump of trees are at least 800 meters away.

Thank you!

Leslie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.152.188.60 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name of the species Japanese or Korean or Far Eastern

Please clarify the name of the species. It is Japanese in the title, but Korean in the body. Is it better to use "Far Eastern" which is more neutral one? --GenuineMongol (talk) 04:30, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

??? I cannot find the word "Korean" in the body. The scientific/binomial name is Hyla japonica and according to this page, the common name in en is "Japanese Tree Frog". The article title at kr WP is just "Tree frog" and the zh title is " Northeast Hyla". I find nothing wrong with the current title. Oda Mari (talk) 06:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Additions

I added a Description, Habitat and Destruction, Conservation, Diet, Mating, Enemies, Behavior, Physiology, and Human Use sections. I added over 1500 words and included 21 references. I added these sections under the ip address 128.252.11.235. ShawnMohammed (talk) 16:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 16:24, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that calling patterns of the Japanese tree frog have been used to further develop wireless network design, furthering an area of science called swarm intelligence? Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120717100123.htm
- Reviewed:

5x expanded by ShawnMohammed (talk). Self-nominated at 17:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Reviewing... –LordPeterII (talk) 15:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - some uncited sentences at the end of paragraphs
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - not the last part about "swarm intelligence" (because that sentence is uncited in the article)
Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Several sentences at the end of paragraphs remain uncited, for example "H. japonica has a dark vocal sac." and "This is due to the necessity of the frog life cycle for both water and land." I could find no other issues; so if those were solved @ShawnMohammed, I can pass the nom. –LordPeterII (talk) 19:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LordPeterII It looks like it might have been taken care of. I will add fixing the citation overkill as a suggestion to the nominator, but that shouldn't stop promotion. SL93 (talk) 02:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A new reviewer is needed. The original reviewer is on a wikibreak. SL93 (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It's been sitting in the queue long enough, I'll take a crack at reviewing it. - Aoidh (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: None required.

Overall:

This source verifies the hook and is cited at the appropriate place in the article, so no concerns there. Article was 1695 characters of prose before expansing and was 11,233 when it was nominated on October 26, more than a 5x expansion of prose. According to QPQ check this is the nom's first nomination, so no QPQ required. Earwig only caught one little phrase that seems to fall under WP:LIMITED. In my opinion the hook is very interesting, so it appears good to go. Well done, certainly more interesting than my first DYK! - Aoidh (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ShawnMohammed (talk)@LordPeterII I added the citations to each of the sentences that you indicated were uncited. I hope this helps! Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do for the DYK nomination. ShawnMohammed (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShawnMohammed (talk • contribs) 17:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello am I able to get a new reviewer for my DYK nomination? ShawnMohammed (talk)

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ShawnMohammed (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Gracedekoker, Hoonji2022, Darreciel.

— Assignment last updated by Eurquhart02 (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Reviews

11/15/22 This article was really strong! I added several hyperlinks to enhance the reading experience- some examples of tiers or words I highlighted were Japan, China, Korea, IUCN, Russia, Mongolia, Ranavirus, lek, spanning animal/ecology terms and more broad geographies. I rephrased a few sentences to make sure that the most important information was upfront, added synonyms to some words to reduce repetitive-ness, deleted extra words to be more clear and concise, and tried to make sure each sentence was well cited (it was!). I also changed the order of the page as well, putting conservation lower down, and behavior higher up as per Wikipedia article best practices. I added a section on ranavirus under conservations since that is an important upcoming problem for these frogs and their tadpoles. Great job!Gracedekoker (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Gracedekoker[reply]