User talk:DawnOfTheBlood

I don't use Wikipedia frequently; if sending me a message does not work | Please send me an e-mail.

.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, DawnOfTheBlood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Assam. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Avic enna sis 07:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your encouragement. May The Force Be With You! Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Removing threads from a discussion board is considered vandalism. If you have a different opinion, post it there and dont remove the entire thread.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Your email to me

I can't run my own WP:CHECKUSER because I do not have access to that tool. It is limited to a small number of trusted administrators, Click here to see a list of them. I suggest you email the Arbitration Committee about your case, you can reach them at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. By the way, most wiki-markup, such as internal links like [[this]] do not work in an email. You could also appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I can only offer the same advice. (I'm guessing Beeblebrox got the same email I did.) I, in fact, am not even an administrator, let alone a checkuser. I would, however, encourage you to pursue a appeal if you truly can prove you are, in fact, not a sock puppet.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same advice here. Also, as an aside, name-calling and claiming that individuals are "agents" based on off-wiki rants against them are not the most credible evidence. You should try to make your arguments without making guesses as to people's motivations. You'd get a lot further if you at least attempted to assume honest mistakes. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]