User talk:Jan Lukas 22

Welcome!

Hi Jan Lukas 22! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! The common practice for the name of a ref is <ref name=Author year>. Grimes2 (talk) 14:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the (late) welcome! The problem with said common practice is that in this case applying it would be confusing, because most references come from only few authors (these ones or the city of cologne), but I will try to follow it when applicable! Jan Lukas 22 (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The name should be unique. <ref name=Author year_2> or if no author <ref name=newspaper year>, but I've never seen a summary of the title. Grimes2 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another convention: Blogs are considered as unreliable sources. Grimes2 (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is a blog still unreliable even if there is a professional team of several people behind it? But yes, independent newspaper articles would be better. Jan Lukas 22 (talk) 15:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]