Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shablog (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 15 March 2007 ([[Winston Churchill]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive is a fortnightly collaboration to improve articles to featured article status.

/History - For past collaborations.
/Removed - For removed nominations.
/Maintenance - ACID upkeep.

Introduction

To vote or nominate you have to be a registered user with at least one contribution that is not a vote. Anyone who does so is encouraged to make at least one edit per vote or nomination to the currently chosen article, Tulmohan Ram (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 30 Oct 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF). Any and all articles may be nominated except:

How to nominate

I
Add nomination

Copy and paste the following template to the bottom of the list of nominations on this page and fill it out.
Please be sure to spell the article correctly, THE NAME IS CASE-SENSITIVE!

==={{la|Article}}===
{{acid|start=October 30, 2024|votes=1}}
<!-- Remember to update the vote counter when you place your vote! -->
; Support:
# ~~~~

; Comments:
* (put your reason for nomination) --~~~~

----

Under "comments" section put explanation of what work is needed.

II
Notify

After submitting the new nomination, go to the nominated article's talk page and put this at the top:

{{ACIDnom}}

How to vote

Sign with "# ~~~~" on the end of the list of the article you want to vote for and then update the vote count in the subhead. Opposing votes are not counted; see approval voting. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Additionally you can give a comment in the comment section; use terms such as appalling and shocking sparingly, remember that every editor that has ever edited a nominated article probably did so to the best of his of her ability.

How the article is selected

Article with the most votes every two weeks or so is selected as "The current Article Improvement Drive article". If two articles have same number of votes, the nominee with the higher number of hits per day over the previous month wins. The following template:

{{Template:ACIDcur}}

is placed atop the article talk page.

How an article is removed from the list

Nominated articles remain on this page for three "selections", after which that article entry is removed from and moved to the page for removed nominations.

Notes


New nominations go *AT THE BOTTOM* :-)

Nominations

21 votes, Nominated January 31, 2007; needs at least 24 votes by March 14, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Iotha 02:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Starwed 11:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 18:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. EdGl 23:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 02:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. M&NCenarius 22:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Lord Metroid 22:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Top importance topic[reply]
  8. Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 08:53Z
  9. BorgQueen 13:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. --Gimlei (talk to me) 01:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Black Falcon 05:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Readro 10:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Twerbrou 13:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. XApple 00:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jack · talk · 15:55, Sunday, 25 February 2007
  16. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talkcontribs) 09:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Annandale 18:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jeltz talk 16:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Mhking 02:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Rifleman 82 04:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 03:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is a basic and central concept in physics, and requires improvement. The article needs cleanup, and I think it deserves some more attention from non-physicists. This is a topic that I imagine many physics students will look at, and I feel that the central concepts ought to be both better presented and more accessible/readable. -- Iotha 02:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Parts of this article are borderline BS, especially the beginning of the explanation section. ("Einstein explained in 1905 that a magnetic field is the relativistic part of an electric field.") It needs a pretty thorough going over, not just for clarity but for correctness. (Much of the article is fine, but the parts that aren't stick out like a sore thumb to me.) --Starwed 11:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Supporting per above. Also, could use references! →EdGl 23:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

41 votes, Nominated January 31, 2007; needs at least 44 votes by April 18, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Paul James Cowie 22:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. First-other-than-nom-SupportEdGl 23:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Amphytrite 01:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. bibliomaniac15 01:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 02:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. YankeeDoodle14 03:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  7. LordHarris 13:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Dweller 14:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. BigrTex 17:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 17:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Caponer 01:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Coemgenus 15:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Wiki-newbie 16:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Crocodile Punter 13:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Cosmopolitancats 03:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 17:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Benbread 13:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Duran 00:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Mtmelendez 20:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Julien 01:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. [|.K.Z|][|.Z.K|] 03:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ouishoebean / (talk) (Humour =)) 11:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Xpontus 15:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Dekimasuが... 18:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Mocko13 14:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Derwig 10:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Jeendan 09:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Twerbrou 13:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. flaw600 14:57, 25 Febuary 2007 (UTC)
  30. Ryubread 10:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. BobbyCat 19:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Petercorless 01:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Annandale 18:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Iwazaki 00:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. TheOne00 14:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Anas Talk? 13:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --יהושועEric 19:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Tommaisey 13:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Qjuad 23:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41.  >|< shablog talk/cont 02:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

02:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


29 votes, Nominated February 2, 2007; needs at least 32 votes by March 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. bibliomaniac15 05:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Wiki-newbie 16:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 16:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 19:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Crocodile Punter 13:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 23:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SpLoT // 05:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. [|.K.Z|][|.Z.K|] 06:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Pi (π) 21:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Goldfritha 22:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kristbg 21:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Dweller 13:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. BigrTex 02:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ouishoebean / (talk) (Humour =)) 11:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mocko13 14:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 13:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Twerbrou 13:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Kyoko 14:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Caponer 04:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. southgeist 04:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. AzaToth 16:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talkcontribs) 09:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Annandale 18:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Flcelloguy (A note?) 20:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Hornandsoccer ContribsTalk 22:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Mhking 02:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Iwazaki 会話。討論 10:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Gutworth 03:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Encyclopedia | The Sum of all Human Knowledge

20 votes, Nominated February 5, 2007; needs at least 24 votes by March 19, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Parker007 11:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Coemgenus 19:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lord Metroid 22:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Wai Hong 08:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. bibliomaniac15 01:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Gimlei (talk to me) 22:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SpLoT // 10:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ouishoebean / (talk) (Humour =)) 11:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. BorgQueen 13:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. kidsheaven 23:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Dylan Lake 23:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ixistant 22:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. M&NCenarius 22:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Dweller 13:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Themcman1 15:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Black Falcon 08:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Jeltz talk 16:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. GDon4t0 (talk to me...) 19:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Zath42 05:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The reason for this nomination is: Wikipedia is planning to make a paper release version very soon after the CD release.

--Parker007 02:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


15 votes, Nominated February 14, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by March 14, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. YankeeDoodle14 03:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Coemgenus 21:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. [|K.Z|] T V C 04:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RexNL 22:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Amphytrite 00:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Black Falcon 05:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kyoko 10:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. per YankeeDoodle --Iwazaki 03:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Caponer 04:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. M&NCenarius 04:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Dweller 13:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Annandale 18:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. LordHarris 00:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • One of the most influential people in history. During his reign the French Revolution, arguably the most important event in modern history, exploded into being. Louis XVI deserves a lot more than the tiny write up he has here. YankeeDoodle14 03:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

14 votes, Nominated February 17, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by March 17, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. K.Z Talk Vandal Contrib 09:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 11:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zbl 22:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SpLoT {新年快乐!} // 09:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ouishoebean / (talk) (Humour =)) 10:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Dylan Lake 23:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hunted by A.K.G. 22:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Black Falcon 02:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Daniel5127 | Talk 07:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. bibliomaniac15 03:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mneumisi 20:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Iwazaki 会話。討論 10:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lord Metroid 18:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Goldfritha 03:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

15 votes, Nominated February 21, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by March 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Jack · talk · 04:44, Wednesday, 21 February 2007
  2. --K.Z Talk Vandal Contrib 05:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SpLoT {新年快乐!} // 09:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 19:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Coemgenus 20:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rifleman 82 22:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. YankeeDoodle14 23:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  8. M&NCenarius 22:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Quarl (talk) 2007-02-28 06:08Z
  10. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talkcontribs) 09:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. bibliomaniac15 03:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mhking 02:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Pierre-Alain Gouanvic 07:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Goldfritha 18:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. BorgQueen 05:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Everyone knows something about this vital nutrient, and I think we should all know more. There's lots already to go on, but it's a mess. I'm pushing for FA, but there may be some way to go - Jack · talk · 04:44, Wednesday, 21 February 2007
  • Recently obtained GA status, and filed for peer review, FA looking very feasible! ^_^ — Jack · talk · 06:52, Tuesday, 13 March 2007

12 votes, Nominated February 22, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by March 22, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Puddytang 21:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. YankeeDoodle14 23:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  3. Dweller 09:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Twerbrou 13:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. BigrTex 00:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. southgeist 04:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Cream147 Shout at me for doing wrong 13:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 13:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Quarl (talk) 2007-02-28 06:08Z
  10. bibliomaniac15 01:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Coemgenus 16:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Gimlei (talk to me) 15:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

13 votes, Nominated February 26, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by March 26, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Zreeon 03:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Black Falcon 02:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Annandale 18:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kidsheaven 00:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. K.Z Talk Vandal Contrib 06:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 15:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Kukini hablame aqui 23:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Shahab 07:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. bibliomaniac15 18:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SpLoT // 08:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lord Metroid 18:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Punkmorten 08:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • For such an important article, it is in a pitiful state. There are no pictures and the textual entry is confusing. Zreeon 03:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should be of interest to all users around the world, the computer games Sid Meier's Civilization III and IV has more information in a better format in its in game documentation than the Wikipedia article. The game's format of listing types of governments might be a better format? Civilization IV goes more into variations within a government. Kidsheaven 00:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

9 votes, Nominated February 28, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by March 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Scorpion 19:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gran2 20:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Maitch 17:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talkcontribs) 10:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. K.Z Talk Vandal Contrib 06:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Felixboy 18:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. It Is Happy
  8. Fr4zer 16:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Davie426481.154.243.217 17:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

11 votes, Nominated March 4, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by March 25, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 06:37Z
  2. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Black Falcon 08:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BigrTex 20:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mhking 02:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Necessary. Abeg92contribs 00:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bifgis 02:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. bibliomaniac15 01:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Punkmorten 08:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hojimachongtalk 17:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Wiki is the #1 most-viewed article on Wikipedia, and it isn't even a Good Article. Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 06:37Z

7 votes, Nominated March 4, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by March 18, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Quarl (talk) 2007-03-04 06:41Z
  2. Black Falcon 08:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. BigrTex 20:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mhking 02:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. bibliomaniac15 03:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. M&NCenarius 23:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Coemgenus 12:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

9 votes, Nominated March 6, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by March 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. bibliomaniac15 01:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 07:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lord Metroid 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Kidsheaven 19:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Anas Talk? 13:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Duran 21:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. LordHarris 00:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • A very influential man in history. I ask you to set aside whatever beliefs you have for this man and think solely about improving the article to the standard it should be at. bibliomaniac15 01:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5 votes, Nominated March 6, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by March 20, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. bibliomaniac15 06:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Mhking 02:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Kidsheaven 00:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Bifgis 02:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Magi Media 23:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

5 votes, Nominated March 7, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by March 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Lord Metroid 16:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. bibliomaniac15 01:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. M&NCenarius 23:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Coemgenus 12:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Punkmorten 08:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Article is a mess of unwikifi design, disputed information and lack of references and source. Even though it is a top important article about a videly known concept. Lord Metroid 16:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

8 votes, Nominated March 8, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by March 29, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. bibliomaniac15 01:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lord Metroid 12:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SpLoT // 14:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. M&NCenarius 23:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 08:37Z
  7. Zath42 05:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

6 votes, Nominated March 8, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by March 22, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 14:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. bibliomaniac15 00:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Coemgenus 12:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Punkmorten 08:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Duran 21:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Caponer 01:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

4 votes, Nominated March 9, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by March 23, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Bifgis 02:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. bibliomaniac15 03:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BorgQueen 05:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

3 votes, Nominated March 12, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by March 19, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Nathanww 03:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. bibliomaniac15 04:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

1 vote, Nominated March 12, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by March 19, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Menasim( discuss ) 12:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --יהושועEric 23:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

3 votes, Nominated March 13, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by March 20, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Jordan042 01:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lord Metroid 20:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
US federal agency; needs an article

1 vote, Nominated March 13, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by March 20, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 02:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The Beatles' magnum opus and arguably the greatest, most influential album of all time. It is loaded with innovative recording techniques and cultural references, in addition to the unforgettable songs themselves. However it failed to achieve even the GA status — certainly worth a group effort. BorgQueen 02:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

6 votes, Nominated March 13, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by March 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Owen 03:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Goldfritha 23:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Awadewit 13:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article is an embarrassment that we should correct sooner rather than later. Owen 03:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article is factually incorrect. I would be willing to write a history of childhood in the eighteenth century and a survey of the discipline of childhood studies. I also have an excellent bibliography that covers the seventeenth century, the eighteenth century, nineteenth century, the middle ages and the Greco-Roman world that might assist others. My bibliography is isolated to Europe, I'm afraid. Awadewit 13:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

10 votes, Nominated March 13, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by April 3, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. KZ Talk Vandal Contrib 05:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. BorgQueen 06:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Punkmorten 08:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Gimlei (talk to me) 15:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Goldfritha 01:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Black Falcon 04:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. bibliomaniac15 05:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. LordHarris 01:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

6 votes, Nominated March 14, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by March 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 01:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. bibliomaniac15 05:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Avenue 07:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. KZ Talk Vandal Contrib 08:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 19:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Caponer 01:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments