Jump to content

User talk:85.147.66.47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fuser55 (talk | contribs) at 00:25, 20 June 2023 (→Contributions on 2023 Reddit API Controversy: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

June 2023

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Various talk pages Doug Weller talk 12:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have no clue what this is in regards to. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 23:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's worrying. Can you explain how:
hawaiian shirts under military gear is their dresscode.
what reason would they have to all wear the same dresscode and join this rally? 85.147.66.47 (talk) 01:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
is not a forum type post? Or this?
Exactly! it wasn't Trump.
it was Bush. :^) 85.147.66.47 (talk) 00:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doug Weller talk 13:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
the first is discussing content of the page the boogaloo boys.
it is the equivelant of saying people wearing swastikas at a neo-nazi rally are probably neo-nazis, and no additional confirmation would be required.
the second one is a joke, i agree that was a bad idea, my bad. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 14:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first was still a forum style post, didn’t discuss sources, guidelines, policies, no way it could be used to improve the article. Doug Weller talk 18:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
it did discuss a source? the picture.
it improves the article by creating consensus on whether the image is relevant. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, you're just asking questions with no comments on sources, policies or guidelines. And it isn't even clear what your opinion is. Doug Weller talk 06:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The stance is for their inclusion, but i'm using the socratic method to avoid the negative sociological effects of asserting that a person is wrong. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 07:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Citing policies or guidelines is a nice cudgel, but if i can refute the central point by its own logic, that seems sufficient as wel. 85.147.66.47 (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not trying to cudgel although admit to disliking using talk pages as a forum. I like the Socratic method but it's not appropriate here and not everyone is as intelligent as you are. Doug Weller talk 10:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you have a nice day :D 85.147.66.47 (talk) 00:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Contributions on 2023 Reddit API Controversy

Hi! I just wanted to reach out and let you know that I've reverted your contribution on 2023 Reddit API Controversy as the sources you cited, although WP:RS, are unrelated to any coverage of the matter. While your points may be valid, they are WP:UNDUE, so please make sure your contributions are related and are covered within the scope of the matter. Thanks! Fuser55 (talk) 00:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:85.147.66.47&oldid=1160998093"