Talk:2021 British Grand Prix

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Formula One C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United Kingdom C‑class Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Motorsport

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject British MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject British MotorsportBritish Motorsport articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

England C‑class Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Northamptonshire C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northamptonshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northamptonshire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorthamptonshireWikipedia:WikiProject NorthamptonshireTemplate:WikiProject NorthamptonshireNorthamptonshire articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hyphenation of "sprint qualifying"

Looking at the relevant articles it seems that not all editors are in agreement about when or if "sprint qualifying" should be hyphenated. I believe that it would be standard to hyphenate when it acts as the modifier of another word within an English compound (ie. "sprint-qualifying winner"), which in some cases could reduce ambiguity (ie. the difference between "sprint-qualifying results" and "sprint qualifying-results"), although personally I don't particularly care how it's written so long as it makes sense. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It don't think one has any particular preference over the other. As long as the article is consistent within its self, I don't care either way.
SSSB (talk) 12:25, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation

Overall this is a very well-written article. I think it would benefit to have the outcome and the major headline of the race in the beginning rather than putting it all the way at the bottom. But it was neutrally written and is up to date. The links work and are to reputable sources. They also use plenty of different sources. They use multiple motorsport news outlets as well as official documents from the FIA and Formula 1. This is very informative, I just would have changed the layout of the information. 192.54.98.221 (talk) 21:54, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the IP editor is referencing the lack of detail in the lead section. If so, I would agree that the lead could be expanded based upon to provide a summary of the body of the text. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 22:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead to short to be removed?

to be removed? 3nt0 (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]