Talk:Forbes
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Forbes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Far-left fake news magazine
Forbes is a far-left fake news magazine that denies biological science and common-sense reality and logic: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dawnstaceyennis/2019/12/19/jk-rowling-comes-out-as-a-terf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poppahick (talk • contribs) 09:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- You probably won't read this, being a banned sockpuppet and all. But since your trollish comment is still up, I may as well reply for the sake of future visitors. 1: A quick skim through the article on Steve Forbes, the editor-in-chief of this "far-left fake news magazine" shows that he seems pretty right-wing. 2: The only thing inaccurate in that article is the "RF" part of "TERF". 66.210.249.135 (talk) 09:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Blacklist and threats to all companies
Forbes is threatening any company who hires Trump's press secretaries with permanemt persecution, unrelated to their editorial content.
"Let it be known to the business world: Hire any of Trump’s fellow fabulists above, and Forbes will assume that everything your company or firm talks about is a lie. We’re going to scrutinize, double-check, investigate with the same skepticism we’d approach a Trump tweet. Want to ensure the world’s biggest business media brand approaches you as a potential funnel of disinformation? Then hire away." TuffStuffMcG (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/randalllane/2021/01/07/a-truth-reckoning-why-were-holding-those-who-lied-for-trump-accountable/?sh=1baf52975710 TuffStuffMcG (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Is forbes taking a conservative slant?
After reading some of the sections above this, I'm not so sure, but this video by Forbes on YouTube [(Biden Attacked Over Taliban Takeover Of Afghanistan In New GOP Ads) [1]] just shows some of the attack ads against Biden with no commentary. That doesn't feel typical for a news agency. Usually they play the ad and make commentary about it. This was just a playback of the ads and some of Biden's statements with no commentary by any news personnel. I've noticed other things in the past about Forbes, but I didn't pay attention too much. This just feels weird. I wouldn't say it counts as sufficient proof on its own, but it raises a few questions for me at least.Fearless lede'r (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC) This title is another example of something I'd normally ignore, but now I'm not so sure: ['Why Did You Abandon The Bagram Airfield?': Austin Pressed On US Moves Before Afghanistan Collapse] [2]Fearless lede'r (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
byxtzuiwqgfiuwcjm
ejfg-kqwyduosag-oicæfudskøv-ERDBVUJ-SK 188.228.18.161 (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Julian Assange cover as Infobox picture?
Forbes did somewhat notably do cover story on Assange/Wikileaks but using such as the primary article photo seems needlessly polarizing. I think it would be appropriate to change the photo (perhaps to a cover from one of their signature list issues? ). GrouchDouglass8 (talk) 05:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Randall Lane is not editor in chief
The article is inconsistent, stating that Steve Forbes is editor-in-chief in the lead while having Randall Lane in the infobox. Some shallow research shows Randall Lane is the chief content officer and an editor but not the editor-in-chief. Edit happened here by User:WakeFan1991, who has a history of making unconstructive edits. The article for Randall Lane is also faulty, edit made by User:MSincccc, possibly in order to reconcile with the Forbes (this) article. Ctleans (talk) 00:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Who owns Forbes? June 2023
Reading an article that was supposedly from Forbes magazine that was emailed to me on June 10, 2023, I find phrasing and view-point different from what I expect from "Forbes". The Wikipedia article about "Forbes" media starts with Whale Media being the majority owner - but, at the very end of the article, it says Austin Russell (young billionaire) bought it in May, 2023. Who owns "Forbes"? 2600:1700:AD47:6830:65B0:A2BE:1CFA:C351 (talk) 14:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC) I've deleted outdated info in lead on ownership and sourced 2023 info in this regard. Significant other info/sourcing in this article is outdated and no longer accurate. Moreover, as the print "Forbes" presumably moves toward oblivion, "Forbes.com" has for some years defined the brand. Yet apparently, an editor here sees this article as primarily about the print magazine, which is fine. At present (aug. 2023) it does still exist! 32.221.207.102 (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Top-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- C-Class magazine articles
- High-importance magazine articles
- WikiProject Magazines articles
- C-Class New York City articles
- Mid-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles