Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 March 23
Appearance
March 23
- OR/UE (non-notable)/LQ — -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 00:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- OR/UE (non-notable)/LQ — -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 00:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- OR/UE (non-notable)/LQ — -- atropos235 ✄ (blah blah, my past) 00:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Obsolete, orphan. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Cooljuno411 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Obsolete, orphan. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Cielomobile (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Obsolete, orphan. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Formerly used in "West Ham station." Related to 2007-03-22 mass nomination. Iamunknown 02:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- user:Kerem Ozcan#Image:IMG 4202.JPG listed for deletion|user:Kerem Ozcan]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:user:Kerem Ozcan|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/user:Kerem Ozcan|contribs]]). - uploaded by [[User talk:
- I uploaded the image, unfortunately named it wrong, and reuploaded it again as image:VesteCoburgNight.jpg . So no need for this. — Kerem Özcan 02:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- LordHarris (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- was deleted from commons for being a derivative of a copyrighted work of art (the photograph that this photograph is of is copyrighted itself) Yonatan talk 04:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Mariamarcen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- See below — Golbez 05:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Mariamarcen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Subject of an article currently being argued on BLP grounds; these pictures were originally put up for speedy by User:Longhair, but in the interest of fostering discussion on the matter I'm taking them to IFD instead. They were uploaded by User:Mariamarcen, whom based on their other uploads, is suspected by User:Hfarmer to be the subject of the article, and thus the owner and releaser of the pictures. However, this cannot be proven, the user having not made a statement either way, let alone a reliably sourced one, and therefore we cannot be sure. I have no opinion on this IFD - I am just moving it from speedy to IFD for the greater community to have a look at. Other images uploaded by User:Mariamarcen include Image:Miriam4.jpg and Image:Miriam as a boy.jpg, which were not put up by speedy by User:Longhair but I mention them here because they suffer from the same lack-of-source-but-possibly-uploaded-by-subject-of-picture issue. I will finally note that User:Mariamarcen has not edited since April 2006, so it is unlikely they will be able to contribute to this discussion. — Golbez 05:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I actually listed all images at Miriam Rivera, not one, as having no source information. -- Longhair\talk 05:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- You marked only two as speedy, this one and the above one. --Golbez 06:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- For the benefit of this page here is my position, in short. The pictures were added by none other than Miriam Rivera herself, or someone acting on her behalf with her approval. A picture from grade school and a picture that looks as if it was taken by her would be impossible for anyone but Miriam or a family member to come by. Then there is the history of contributions by the person who added the pictures. User:Mariamarcen seems to be rather knowledgeable about topics related to the very subculture Miriam lives in. If this is not proof, what would be? An "established wikipedia presence" as a contributor to be honest that could be faked. A signed notarized legal affadavit with witnesses? That would be proof but come on what other image has that kind of heavy requierment on it? By the same standards that are actually in practice on wikipedia these pictures seem to be just fine.--Hfarmer 09:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- You marked only two as speedy, this one and the above one. --Golbez 06:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that this image (Image:Miriam3.jpg) comes under the fair use rationale as 1) it was provided as a promotional image by the subject herself 2) it is solely used to illustrate the subject in question (Miriam Rivera) and 3) a suitable free image is not readily available in this case, nor will it likely be. - Alison☺ 17:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that photo was taken by Maya Guez. If so, getting it released should be pretty easy by contacting her directly. However, Miriam modeled with a few big-name photographers who probably would not release their work into the public domain. I suggest we delete this and contact Maya for a GFDL-released image. Jokestress 19:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that this image (Image:Miriam3.jpg) comes under the fair use rationale as 1) it was provided as a promotional image by the subject herself 2) it is solely used to illustrate the subject in question (Miriam Rivera) and 3) a suitable free image is not readily available in this case, nor will it likely be. - Alison☺ 17:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Duplicate of Image:P03372.011 kittybomber.jpg — Grant | Talk 05:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
- Image is a phostoshoped collage of multiple images from various sources. None of these sources is cited. Cited source is a holding space at another web site. — J Greb 05:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Glfootball92 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Delete, upload Image:Pleasedont.gif, protect from recreation; the image has been uploaded and deleted multiple times, and in the currently visible log under "File history" has been changed twice. Iamunknown 05:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Slaughterhouseo1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image lacks fair use rationale, and is likely to give seizures — Nardman1 06:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
- CV (uploader claimed GNU FDL but it is certainly not, see http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html for detail. Similar Images have been deleted before — Arved 13:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
- Unencyclopedic; licensing info not backed up; appears to have been uploaded by user solely to diss the subjects of the photographs.
Same goes for Image:TAIJI.JPG.
-- ran (talk) 14:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- OB Image:HMS Cornwall (F99).jpg obsoleted by Image:HMS Cornwall F99 July 2006.jpg The first image is used under an unfree license that prevents 3rd party use, however the new image is under the Creative commons 2.0 sharealike license. — malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 14:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 14:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, if I upload the image on another site, can I still keep it? Because I believe I did that once before. ---- DanTD 16:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- JoelGRichards (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphan — Jay†Litman 14:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- no rationale, assumes public domain but ww2incolor is a notorious ripoff site that scans color images from books discarding the copyright information- no claim that the image is PD is made on the site, no detail as to who took the image are made, most likely a German photographer placing the image under German copyright law. Examples of the aircraft are preserved anyway meaning use of a picture with no details just plain lazy. — Fluffy999 15:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned BigrTex 15:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 16:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Not clear to me that this is actually a Silver Certificate after reading the article and comparing it to other bills displayed BigrTex 16:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned; replaced with Slabs.svg on commons Selket Talk 16:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Markus Krötzsch (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Obsolete via Hypercube cubes.svg on commons -- Selket Talk 18:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned BigrTex 18:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, this is a duplicate. Somnabot 20:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- VitaleBaby (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned BigrTex 18:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indianhilbilly (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR,UE — BigrTex 19:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indianhilbilly (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR,CV — BigrTex 19:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indianhilbilly (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, possible Copyright violation BigrTex 19:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan — BigrTex 20:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- OneExoticBoy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned BigrTex 21:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- OneExoticBoy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, doubtful copyright tag BigrTex 21:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, uncertain copyright status. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Low quality for a screenshot. Peter O. (Talk) 21:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)