User talk:JackBridgestone

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello JackBridgestone. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you! Obsidi♠n Soul 08:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JackBridgestone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JackBridgestone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JackBridgestone. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xpanse CGI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Branding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JackBridgestone. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Ashraf Ghori, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 20:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Waqqas Qadir Sheikh

The article Waqqas Qadir Sheikh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable director, fails to meet WP:DIRECTOR and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JackBridgestone. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You need to disclose any relationship you have with the articles you tend to edit - especially around Ashraf Ghori, Xero Error, Xpanse CGI and other related articles. You also need to review the WP:PAID disclosures and make any needed disclosures. If you are being paid to edit the articles, directly or indirectly, or work for one the related people or companies, you are considered a paid editor. These disclosures are required by the Wikipedia Terms of Use. Ravensfire (talk) 04:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Your recent editing history at Batman: Arkham Origins shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 16:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m Truly Sorry just please I Plead you don’t revert it back, I’m sorry JackBridgestone (talk) 16:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be sorry, stop doing it. The games nor the developers mention a date the games are set in, for I assume intentional reasons because there is no reason to tie them to a year. Your evidence is you posting screenshots on Reddit from a trailer for ARkham Origins, which of course, it's a game released in 2013 and set on December 24 so a trailer will say 2013 because it's advertising. Your other evidence is a pill bottle and some stamps for Arkham Knight, but as far as you know those pills are expired. The most likely explanation is a designer re-used or created assets and just threw a date on there. THere is nothing about the games that requires them to be tied to a specific time and date, and there are other redditors contradicting you in your posts. Unless there is an official source for these dates from the studio or developers, you searching every nook and cranny for assets with dates on and screenshotting them on Reddit is insufficient and ultimately I don't understand why you are wasting so much time trying to prove something that doesn't matter. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 11:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of All Stop thinking I'm a Joke, you think it's easy to always see you reverting my work and only for me to set it back again, and Second, I'm not the Redditor guy. I'm just trying to help you understand what Year The Games are set In. Please Listen. I'm Just Trying To Show People What Exact Year Arkham Games Are Set In. It's like what the hells the point of showing the Last of us games prologue is in 2013, it's never mentioned in the Games, Same thing is with Arkham Verse, I Swear if you remove 2013 as The Prologue Of Last Of Us then I Won't Do it For Arkham Games, But Of Course you won't, would you? It's Not Necessary For The Devs To Mention Dates Just Like Last Of Us. Please, I Just Want to Show The Year Arkham Knight Set In, What the hell is the Loss for you if I put dates??? Look your A Good Guy👍, But Please Put Dates. It's Like Wasting time putting dates for The Last Of Us Game when it mentioned no dates at all. I Would Love To Put My Time Putting Dates for Games. Advertising Word Just Sounds Wrong, it's Like Last Of Us. Clearly It's 2013 for a good reason. And How Do You Know Those Pill Bottle Are Expired, How do you even know that??? Ok, Fine if I can't Put Dates why Not you do it for me, Are you happy now at least.Please, I Worked My ass off finding these dates, I Plead You to Stop Reverting My Hard Work. Do You Know What Year Arkham Knight Set In With Proof??? JackBridgestone (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We really don't need to have an exact date of the Batman Arkham games, as it is unnecessary and useless. You did the same thing in Batman: Arkham Knight here and here. I told you on Darkwarriorblake's talk page that Reddit is an extremly unreliable source. Don't add dates to the story unless you have a reliable source. This can help you know what sources are reliable or not. TheCorvetteZR1^{(The Garage)} 20:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then we don’t really need a date for 2013 prologue in Last of us as well, right? I Mean, Why Can’t we even put any of the games release date? I Had A Question, Do you have Proof What year Arkham Knight Is Set In? I’m Sorry but the only source is Reddit but the Dates Are all real, If I Can’t Put Dates Why Not you do it for me JackBridgestone (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Batman: Arkham Knight, you may be blocked from editing. TheCorvetteZR1^{(The Garage)} 17:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning @JackBridgestone: I will block you if there is any further disruption or more personal attacks such as at User talk:Y2kcrazyjoker4. You must not repeat contested edits. Instead, you need to engage in discussion on the article talk page and wait for consensus that your proposal should be accepted. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 09:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]