This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Forbes article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business Top‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Magazines High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blacklist and threats to all companies

Forbes is threatening any company who hires Trump's press secretaries with permanemt persecution, unrelated to their editorial content.

"Let it be known to the business world: Hire any of Trump’s fellow fabulists above, and Forbes will assume that everything your company or firm talks about is a lie. We’re going to scrutinize, double-check, investigate with the same skepticism we’d approach a Trump tweet. Want to ensure the world’s biggest business media brand approaches you as a potential funnel of disinformation? Then hire away." TuffStuffMcG (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/randalllane/2021/01/07/a-truth-reckoning-why-were-holding-those-who-lied-for-trump-accountable/?sh=1baf52975710 TuffStuffMcG (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is forbes taking a conservative slant?

After reading some of the sections above this, I'm not so sure, but this video by Forbes on YouTube [(Biden Attacked Over Taliban Takeover Of Afghanistan In New GOP Ads) [1]] just shows some of the attack ads against Biden with no commentary. That doesn't feel typical for a news agency. Usually they play the ad and make commentary about it. This was just a playback of the ads and some of Biden's statements with no commentary by any news personnel. I've noticed other things in the past about Forbes, but I didn't pay attention too much. This just feels weird. I wouldn't say it counts as sufficient proof on its own, but it raises a few questions for me at least.Fearless lede'r (talk) 08:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC) This title is another example of something I'd normally ignore, but now I'm not so sure: ['Why Did You Abandon The Bagram Airfield?': Austin Pressed On US Moves Before Afghanistan Collapse] [2]Fearless lede'r (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

byxtzuiwqgfiuwcjm

ejfg-kqwyduosag-oicæfudskøv-ERDBVUJ-SK 188.228.18.161 (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Assange cover as Infobox picture?

Forbes did somewhat notably do cover story on Assange/Wikileaks but using such as the primary article photo seems needlessly polarizing. I think it would be appropriate to change the photo (perhaps to a cover from one of their signature list issues? ). GrouchDouglass8 (talk) 05:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Lane is not editor in chief

The article is inconsistent, stating that Steve Forbes is editor-in-chief in the lead while having Randall Lane in the infobox. Some shallow research shows Randall Lane is the chief content officer and an editor but not the editor-in-chief. Edit happened here by User:WakeFan1991, who has a history of making unconstructive edits. The article for Randall Lane is also faulty, edit made by User:MSincccc, possibly in order to reconcile with the Forbes (this) article. Ctleans (talk) 00:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who owns Forbes? June 2023

Reading an article that was supposedly from Forbes magazine that was emailed to me on June 10, 2023, I find phrasing and view-point different from what I expect from "Forbes". The Wikipedia article about "Forbes" media starts with Whale Media being the majority owner - but, at the very end of the article, it says Austin Russell (young billionaire) bought it in May, 2023. Who owns "Forbes"? 2600:1700:AD47:6830:65B0:A2BE:1CFA:C351 (talk) 14:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted outdated info in lead on ownership and sourced 2023 info in this regard. Significant other info/sourcing in this article is outdated and no longer accurate. Moreover, as the print "Forbes" presumably moves toward oblivion, "Forbes.com" has for some years defined the brand. Yet apparently, an editor here sees this article as primarily about the print magazine, which is fine. At present (aug. 2023) it does still exist!

32.221.207.102 (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strangely, an editor insists on reverting this article to inaccurate information based on outdated sources. The action was taken with the claim that the information was "uncited." Yet it was indeed offered with a sourcce. I will restore it and add more sources. 32.221.207.102 (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

a solid (much needed) SOURCE dated aug. 2023

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2020; 2021;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

https://www.cjr.org/the_feature/forbes-big-business.php

Forbes councils

There is a redirect from Forbes Business Council to this page. But when I got here, I didn't see a anything on Forbes Business Council so I decided to create a Forbes councils section, yesterday. I just came to see if I can make more contributions to it, only to and find out that it has been deleted for reason that my citations are from paid blogs. Forbes councils do exist, and there's a lot of information about it online. I would suggest that anyone who has time and can identify credible sources should please rewrite the section and make appropriate citations as I cannot help beyond what I have already done. I think it's good we have a section on this. Bemmax (talk) 05:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2021
This page is archived by ClueBot III.