Draft:Audiovisual Identity Database
Submission declined on 28 April 2023 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has not been edited in over six months and qualifies to be deleted per CSD G13. Declined by Theroadislong 18 months ago. Last edited by Wikisplat 9 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
|
Submission declined on 18 March 2023 by Spiderone (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Spiderone 19 months ago. |
Type of site | Internet encyclopedia Reference for on-screen corporate identities |
---|---|
Available in | English |
Registration | Optional |
Launched | 2007 |
Current status | Active |
The Audiovisual Identity Database (formerly known as the CLG Wiki) is an online encyclopedia. It is best known for describing production logos of various companies.
History
In 1999 a group called the CLG Wiki slowly formed and later went onto google groups. The website wasn't formed until around 2000 or 2001-ish. They later moved to miraheze and rebranded to Audiovisual Identity Database around 2021.
Features
The wiki's general pages feature the company's background, visual descriptions of its identities, the techniques used, the audio heard, availability, and the legacy of specific idents, whether it be throughout pop culture or within the wiki's community.
External links
Category:Internet properties established in 2007 Category:Wiki communities Category:Wikis Category:Wiki controversies
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.