Talk:Omnitrans

California: Inland Empire / Southern California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Inland Empire task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Buses Mid‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ridership?

Placed a source tag under Ridership. Since when does public (bus) transportation ridership indicate the status of the general economy? --theSpectator _talk 23:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

transit district

a few days ago, the press enterprise reported how omnitrans was trying to become a transit district, would that go in as controversy or future decisionsJaviern (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only article that I could find on the PE site was this one, and I couldn't find any mention of a "transit district". What exactly do you mean by transit district? --TorriTorri^{(Talk to me!)} 04:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

if omnitrans becomes a transit district like la Metro, they have the ability to put on the ballot propositions where they can add a transit tax such as the tax to expand the la subway. in omnitrans case,it would be to provide more routes. it was not that article. it was a few days prior to that one. if can find it again, i will put a link here 75.16.40.24 (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Omnitrans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080510141317/http://www.omnitrans.org/about/quik-facts.shtml to http://www.omnitrans.org/about/quik-facts.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]