Jump to content

User talk:Yoshi24517

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.8.114.154 (talk) at 23:01, 7 February 2024 (Reply to your post on my talkpage:: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

60s

Please mind your language. I believe it is not wrong at all at what I did. In fact, if I had my way, I would reedit all the years. You guys say 1001-2000 is the 2nd millennium and 1901-2000 is the 20th century. Then why do we need to make things inconsistent by adding a pop-culture created decade in the form of 1960-1969 when it is actually 1961-1970. 136.54.56.86 (talk) 17:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because 1960s is anything that is 196X, hence the 60s. 1970 doesn't belong there, does it? Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument is completely based on pop culture hogwash and not at all convincing. When we say 16th century or even 1500s, people still say 1501-1600. 136.54.56.86 (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous


a user you have warned

carries on vandalizing: The user name is Helloguyamigos. --2003:6:33AE:3D55:29DC:E859:2ED3:80BF (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey sorry about the Dans Mon Esprit Tout Divague is it ok if i add real info

sorry Hjhgbnuhvbyhbn (talk) 21:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your post on my talkpage:

You wrote that I removed content without adequately explaining why and then explained how to use the edit summary, but I did write something in that summary, I wrote this: "This is in the infobox and completely pointless to have in the lead section" What's inadequate about that? The information removed was just a post code and area code which is completely unnecessary to have in the lead section. That information is also in the side infobox so why duplicate it? 86.8.114.154 (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]