Jump to content

Talk:Jim Benepe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 16:19, 11 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Golf}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Chicago}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jim Benepe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jim Benepe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Highest OWGR in Benepe's template

[edit]

Nigej, Benepe's highest OWGR ranking should be here. It was at least #88 but perhaps higher (check 1988 season).

Oogglywoogly (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Oogglywoogly[reply]

Classic example of where the player's page is incorrect eg http://www.owgr.com/en/Ranking/PlayerProfile.aspx?playerID=677&year=1989 which covers 1989. This page is generated by the back-fitting exercise. The main problem is that the back-fitting for the first 12 weeks of 1989 is completely wrong since the backfitting uses averages whereas the actual rankings used totals at this time. see eg http://dps.endavadigital.net/owgr/doc/content/archive/1989/owgr02f1989.pdf for week 2 which has Benepe at 117 while the backfitting has him incorrectly at 88. You will also see that the backfitting has him at exactly 100 for week 15 of 1989. However again this is wrong: http://dps.endavadigital.net/owgr/doc/content/archive/1989/owgr15f1989.pdf shows that he was actually at 101. NB You can also see from this page that he had only played 66 events in the preceding 3 years, lower than most of the others - which is why he was higher when averages came in. In summary: looking at the actual rankings at the time his highest ranking seems to be 101 in week 15 of 1989. Nigej (talk) 12:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]