Talk:Bloop

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bloop article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 260 days

Limnology and Oceanography Low‑importance

	Oceans portal This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gawr Gura's sidekick

The addition to the popular culture section about VTuber Gawr Gura's sidekick was removed as vandalism, but I do not see how it is such. Her sidekick Bloop is clearly named after the subject matter of this article. This becomes evident when she lists option C when she quizzes her friends on him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkbXdXbs8vk&t=2383 The correct answer may have been 'B' ("emergency ration"), but it shows that there is a relevant connection. Kapten Nordstroem (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say it was vandalism. I said it was "non notable". ApLundell (talk) 14:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I misread the page history. It was the person who added the pop-culture reference that removed vandalism. Kapten Nordstroem (talk) 22:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I need the bloop sound 2601:803:482:C310:69E3:251E:8FF:BF02 (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be a more extensive section on cultural relevance?

Due to how extremely common "The Bloop" has become as a creature in "internet culture", I feel a larger section on it's usage and the popular depictions of it as a fish with a large mouth is warranted. 79.167.144.73 (talk) 00:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]