Jump to content

Talk:Hannah John-Kamen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by TDKR Chicago 101 (talk | contribs) at 12:19, 19 September 2024 (New Photo: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hannah John-Kamen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars?

[edit]

Is there a particular reason her role in Star Wars hasn't been included, or is it simply that no one has added it yet? -- 109.77.214.47 (talk) 04:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Photo

[edit]

An IP added file:Hannah John-Kamen Comic-Con 2024.jpg to the article, but to me it looks distorted and uncomplimentary. Anybody agree? PKT(alk) 19:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The quality is poor. I reverted the image back to the 2018 version. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 12:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]