Template talk:Wycombe
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
All these tiny hamlets and urban suburbs are perhaps only notable for Midsomer Murders or 1960s extensions of towns...
[edit]The editor who decided to pen articles for each hamlet in the county has not come across WP:UKCITIES.
Really could we not do as others do and combine hamlets under a Localities heading of the main parish? That is after all how most are found: it provides a ready-made commune in the European model for how communities (supposedly, and commonly) operate with say a football team or an arts society for the whole parish, and many other features in common usually based on the civil parish council. While this multi-article mania is indicative of growing compartmentalisation of every community, I do not support departing from the guidance, even if quite justifiably you can purport a rural neighbourhood as having more to it "visually at least" than every urban neighbourhood. The underlying reason behind this guidance seems to be WP:Notability and What Wikipedia is not This comment is replicated on WP:BUCKS so please add your thoughts there. -Adam37 (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)