User talk:67.110.68.99
Heroes (TV series) edits
Hello. Your recent edits and reverts to Heroes (TV series) have been reverted. Please note that the fictional character Isaac Mendez uses heroin to activate his precognitive abilities; Peter Petrelli does not. They are not the person and do not have the same power. Also, please do not make insulting or offensive edit summaries. Address content, not other users. Finally, I fear you misunderstand the policy Don't be a dick which you seem to enjoy referencing in your edit summaries. It does not apply to content disputes such as this. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 22:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- YOu have far surpassed 3 reverts, breaking a wikipedia policy. Further, your edit summaries are becomeing incredibly hostile. I recommend you take a break, go for a walk, and come back with a cool head. ThuranX 22:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions[1] made on October 27 2006 to Heroes (TV series)
The duration of the block is 24 hours.
And the incivility doesn't help either
William M. Connolley 11:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Tag removal
Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages, as you did with No Motiv, unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. Kafziel Talk 16:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Second warning - do not remove cite needed tags from articles. Wikipedia policy requires citing information whenever it is needed or requested; even if you don't think a source is necessary, you can't remove tags placed in good faith without adding a source. Kafziel Talk 17:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- What if I AM the source, dumbass? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- What happened to the whole "this is me ignoring you" thing? Kafziel Talk 19:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- What if I AM the source, dumbass? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
Your "I told you so"
For what it's worth, I also told them so - months ago. But article talk pages are no place for that sort of thing. Let's just be happy it's settled and move on. Kafziel Talk 16:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
3RR warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At any rate please do not do more than three reverts in a 24h period. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Kafziel Talk 17:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm.. that's good advice.. Might want to FOLLOW it and not remove things that don't need to be removed. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 17:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
No personal attacks
With regards to your comments on No Motiv: [2] Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kafziel Talk 17:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, i left it alone so you wouldn't go into a hissy fit. Dude, do you need your bottle or something? I think star trek might be on, watch that and chill out. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- Why couldn't you just leave it alone and not be insulting? Why do you have to keep it up now? Does it make you feel like a tough guy to talk trash on the Internet? If so, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Kafziel Talk 18:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I insult the stupid because they are just that - 'stupid'. Its not my concern if you're offended. If you are, then you should do something about it. There is no citation needed for the No Motiv information as I AM the citation. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- Why you want me to do something about it? Kafziel Talk 18:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I insult the stupid because they are just that - 'stupid'. Its not my concern if you're offended. If you are, then you should do something about it. There is no citation needed for the No Motiv information as I AM the citation. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- OH NOEZ A WIKINERDZ THRETZ! How about you follow your own advice, shut the hell up, and move on? Yes? No? Dumb? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- That wasn't a threat, it was a question. Kafziel Talk 19:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hey check it out - this is me ignoring you now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 19:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- That wasn't a threat, it was a question. Kafziel Talk 19:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why couldn't you just leave it alone and not be insulting? Why do you have to keep it up now? Does it make you feel like a tough guy to talk trash on the Internet? If so, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Kafziel Talk 18:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, i left it alone so you wouldn't go into a hissy fit. Dude, do you need your bottle or something? I think star trek might be on, watch that and chill out. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.68.99 (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
Name calling
As a wikinerd I just want to remind you that it is important to be civil in our communications even when we disagree. Additionally, although you may have first hand knowledge about No Motiv unfortunately that is not the standard that an encylopedia requires. Information needs to be attributed to secondary sources (or published primary sources in some cases).
Regardless of the above - additional name calling or comments like "do something" could result in a block. Which (I know) doesn't matter to you because you don't have time to add and delete stuff from Wikipedia all day. But in the interest of being fair I wanted to mention it. --Trödel 19:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked
{ {unblock}} Wikinerds got their peepees made fun of, it doesn't nessecitate a block. Please remove head from anal cavity, thank you.
67.110.68.99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Wikinerds got their peepees made fun of, it doesn't nessecitate a block. Please remove head from anal cavity, thank you.
Decline reason:
Continued personal attacks - even in asking for the unblock -- --Trödel 21:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -Pilotguy hold short 16:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 16:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |