Jump to content

Talk:16 (number)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Java7837 (talk | contribs) at 22:03, 10 July 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Numbers rating

WikiProject iconNumbers Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJudaism Unassessed Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
  • What is the point in this page - it is, and as far as I can see always will be, a purely dictionary-definition page
What is the point in Wikipedia? After seeing what just happened to lower numbers, it would surprise me if not interesting facts about sixteen may spring up.
That said, I agree that number articles really only need to be created for interesting numbers. The English language numerals stop at twenty - that would seem like a suitable limit. -- Egil 11:47 Apr 10, 2003 (UTC)
You can prove by contradiction that there are no uninteresting numbers. Suppose that x is the largest interesting number, then by definition x+1 is the smallest uninteresting number. But then x+1 is interesting by being the smallest uninteresting number. Therefore, by contradiction, there are no uninteresting numbers. Enjoy! -- Ams80 22:00 Apr 10, 2003 (UTC)
Invalid proof! Suppose 9 is uninteresting but 10 is the largest interesting number, then you say 11 is the small uninteresting... but 9 is less than 11! (but yes the proof could be made to work.) Pcb21 11:41 13 Jun 2003 (UTC)
I think numbers have as much need for definition and explanation as any other item in Wikipedia. IanUK 18:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hip hop song

so where exactly could we get a citation for "sixteen is slang for hip hop song"? Numerao 21:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


RE Netherlands ages You can't buy weed or watch porn in the Netherlands till you're 18.