User talk:Duff man2007

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Zephead999 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Led Zeppelin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrisKawling 03:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Halo 3, you will be blocked from editing. Stryik 04:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Halo 3, you will be blocked from editing. Spigot Map 04:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Shut Up and Drive (Rihanna song), you will be blocked from editing. Spigot Map 04:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Halo 3. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your general lack of respect for editors has gone too far. I'm not sure why you haven't been blocked already. Stryik 04:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SOS and ANY OTHER ARTICLE you edit

Guess what buddy? Wikipedia has policies. Statements MUST BE SOURCED RELIABLY. "Go watch the VMAs" is not a reliable source. Guess what? American VMAs don't play on my television... why? Because I'm not in the US. Spigot Map 04:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EVERYTHING on this encyclopedia are to be sourced. That's what fact tags are for. Please don't remove them again as it constitutes vandalism. And refrain from being uncivil. Spigot Map 04:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe she played at the VMAs, but that's not the point. The point is the tag was there for a reason. Do not remove fact tags unless you are replacing them with a source. Spigot Map 04:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your way is about to get you blocked. You have a blatant disregard for wikipolicy. You do not own anything on this encyclopedia and things are not "your way". Spigot Map 04:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, glad to see you took a turn away from vandalism. Thanks for helping with cleanup. Spigot Map 04:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a head's up: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Duff man2007 Stryik 04:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Template:3RR5 Note: Please don't repeatedly add non-encyclopedic material to articles. When there's a dispute, don't keep putting the material back in, take it to the talk page and discuss it. AKRadecki^Speaketh 05:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Akradecki, please un-ban me

I did nothing wrong. I had to quickly add that back in becuse they kept on removing it. Infact, if you check I provided links backing up the info that I provided, and they still felt compelled to remove it. I was even discussing this on the talk page, and they still removed it. Again, please un-ban me. Duff man2007 05:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. What do you mean you did nothing wrong? You really need to take a few minutes and read our policies. You've been told this before. We have rules, here, and you're expected to follow them. In this case, it's the 3 Revert Rule. I'll count this diff as your original, just because I don't want to go back farther. So, the reverts were: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. That's an astounding 19 reverts! And you claim to have done nothing wrong? You can consider yourself lucky to have gotten off with just a 24 hour block. There's already been allegations of sockpuppetry...if I find you doing that to avoid this block, you'll be blocked indefinitely. Take some time off, read our policies, and be ready to come back and write encyclopedic content and live by our rules. Oh, and by the way, a leek is a vegetable. I doubt there's a whole lot of them on Ebay. Maybe you were thinking of a leak, meaning something that gets out of a hole? AKRadecki^Speaketh 05:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AKRadeckiSpeaketh, you gotta be joking me.

Like I said, I wen to the discussion page and talked about it first. And they STILL got rid of the info without even talking about it on the discussion page for at least 15 or so min. So what was I supposed to do? If I did not do anything they probably never wuold have said anything on the discussion page. So then they wanted some valid sources, I provided a valid soruce, and also told them there are plenty more on the internet. They STILL did not believe me, and simply called it a "hoax" even where there was visual proof it was leaked, AND was provided a link to the Halo 3 page on Ebay. And *I* am the one that gets banned? Do I really need to tell you how asinine that is? Like I said, please un-ban me and ban them. Duff man2007 14:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]