User talk:VanishedUser 261249

Hello. If you want to contact me, use email: luvnpeas99[at]yahoo.com . If you are looking for some personality, you can look at my blog [1] or Web site [2]. Entries made here will be deleted promptly.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Allgoodnamesalreadytaken, you will be blocked from editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allgoodnamesalreadytaken (talk • contribs)

WP:AN/I Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic [[:]]. Thank you.

Thought you'd want to know. --SXT4^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 03:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allgoodnamesalreadytaken (talk • contribs)

SSP on User:Gtadoc

IDK, if this belongs over there or not, but, here's my analysis of the respective contribs, use it if you want, but, If you're going to move forward with this, you will need to show how these accounts are being abusive, if they are indeed socks. WP:SOCK is where you'll find the relevant policy.

Here's my understanding of the timeline from the respective users contribs:

User:Gtadoc stops editing 8/10/07 at 16:49
User:Allgoodnamesalreadytaken registers at 16:54.
User:Gtadoc picks back up editing at 17:00 to tell User:Allgoodnamesalreadytaken that he or she has quit Wikipedia.
User:Allgoodnamesalreadytaken picks up editing at 17:06 until 17:07. No further edits until 8/19/07.
User:Gtadoc Edits again at 17:15 and, calls it a day, until 8/19/07.
User:Gtadoc Resumes editing at 02:15 on 8/19/07, until 02:31.
User:Allgoodnamesalreadytaken Picks up editing on the same article, at 03:02, and, edits until 03:07. Calls it quits until 08/23/07.
User:Gtadoc Picks back up on editing at 03:10, until 03:11. Then, resumes editing at 12:15 until the user's final edit at 12:17

Be forewarned, I've been known to make mistakes, and, this summary isn't necessarily proof one way or another. --SXT4^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 07:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism, you will be blocked from editing. Adding sockpuppet tags (as you've ben told by admin) to users who have not violated WP:SOCK is not appropriate, repeatedly doing so after warning is considered vandalism. Please read WP:SOCK if you don't understand WP policies. Allgoodnamesalreadytaken 12:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm SQL now...

Just a note, I Had my username changed, to one that I like better (From SXT40 to SQL), if you need anything, I can be reached at User talk:SQL. --SQL^{(Query Me!)} 06:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gtadoc

It's pretty straightforward, Bsharvy; the evidence you and others presented in the case didn't show that Gtadoc/Allgoodnamesalreadytaken had violated policy. In particular, the evidence doesn't show that they've double-voted or jointly violated 3RR, two of the most common actions that get sockpuppets blocked.

What we've got is two accounts, who claim to be different people who know each other, that have made similar comments on talk pages. You raise some legitimate suspicion that both accounts are run by the same person, but what have these accounts actually done that violates policy? Advocating the same position on talk pages isn't enough to justify a block, unless there's evidence of double voting or long-term disruption. Note further that Gtadoc hasn't edited since Aug. 19 and claims to be retired; if that remains the case, then there's no continuing sockpuppetry. --Akhilleus (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AllGoodNames / Gtadoc

Hey... After the SSP, I think, it's time to let go... Everyone has a good point. So long as Gtadoc isn't editing, there's not really an issue. Mostly, even if he does restart editing, so long as they stay off the same articles, they're good.

I just don't think, that wasting your time pursuing this matter any further, is going to be of any benefit to you, or, the project... Anyhow, for what it's worth, I think it would be best to just let this go... If there's anything else, that you need, feel free to contact me via my talkpage. SQL^{(Query Me!)} 04:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiroshima Nagasaki talk page

I took the liberty to mention you and your opinions (as I understood them) here [[3]], to try to achieve consensus for the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing article. Hope you dont mind, and that I didnt misunderstood you. I would clearly welcome your comment. --Firkenknecht 08:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]