Jump to content

User talk:Khanhamzakhan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Khanhamzakhan (talk | contribs) at 03:36, 25 October 2007 (Block). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Khanhamzakhan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  —Mira 11:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pashtun mafia?

The information you provided about the pashtun mafia promises to be interesting. But it has to be referenced. Are you in a position to cite an authoritative, verifiable source for this information? If so, please add it

The wikipedia has three key policies: WP:NPOV, WP:NOR and WP:VER. If you can't find a citation your connection will eventually be removed, because it does not comply with these policies.

Cheers! Geo Swan 09:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, the existing references don't support the connection you added to the Pashtun Mafia, just that they Abdul Qadir was accused of ties to organized crime. You have to find a reference that explicitly ties these men to "pashtun mafia".
I'll help you, if I can. Is Pasha Khan Zadran also a druglord?
Cheers! Geo Swan 09:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You cited the Asia Times -- a good source -- to tie men to the Pashtun mafia. But a google search doesn't actually show the Asia Times ever used this phrase.
A google search for the two separate words pashtun and mafia gives this list. It offers links that would enable us to add individuals to the article about the Opium production in Afghanistan. But not to pashtun mafia.
Cheers! Geo Swan 09:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Bashir Noorzai. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ROGER TALK 10:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Noorzai Organization. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ROGER TALK 10:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Badal (justice/revenge), by 68.39.174.238 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Badal (justice/revenge) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Badal (justice/revenge), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:18251272.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:365_abdul_haq.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:370 opium heroin2050081722-9297.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:370 opium heroin2050081722-9297.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:365 abdul haq.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:365 abdul haq.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:18251272.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:18251272.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Pashtun Articles

We need to work on getting users like Behnam and Anoshirawan banned or blocked because they are severely vandalising Pashtun culture and Pashtun people related articles. An example is that of Mirwais Khan Hotak and the Hotaki dynasty, where they are trying to show that the Hotaks were not Ghilzai Pashtuns, but were Tatars or Uzbeks.zakka 13:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pashtun Mafia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. You need to discuss this on the talk page rather than continually reverting. And accusing users of vandalism when you're not sure if they are or aren't is not nice, please see WP:AGF. Thanks! Gscshoyru 04:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Actually, I didn't look at the actual sources yet. I just removed the sections without any citations whatsoever. That doesn't mean that the rest of the sections were supported by the references, or that that the references conformed to wiki policy. NangOnamos, he did create the article, it's in the history. But that doesn't matter at all, Khanhamzakhan, see WP:OWN. Also, both of you need to see WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Additionally, you've now both broken the WP:3RR rule which I warned you both about, so you will both probably end up blocked for 24 hours or so. Use the block to calm down, and I'll take a look at the article, and I'll see what's supported and what isn't, ok? Gscshoyru 12:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violation of WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Ronnotel 03:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move from Pashtun Mafia. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Gscshoyru 11:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that but I have been blocked before because this user keeps on Vandalising the page ; makes personal attacks on the discussion page; deletes stuff with out any compromise on the discussion page. Going through his history you don't see any positive contribution that he has ever made to any article. He does arounds deleting material from articles. I have on multiple occassion asked him for sources for his claims. I have posted various refernces till yet he has to produce a single refernce about his claims. the reason I copy and pasted it because I didn't want my self to get blocked. I repsect you ; you were the first one to stop him to vandalize this article. On the discussion page ; you can see we run around in cricles ; He tells me that the article has no sources ; I provide all the soucces even though they are on the articles main page; he says the authors of the those sources are incorrect; I tell him that they came in major news papers and if he has a problem take it witht the publisher. He deleted the stuff and says that I didn't provide any sources and starts the cycle again. Hope we can find a solution to it. I have at various times edited the article changed the wording to better represent the refernces and be more expressive and to come off as I am blaming an organization not an ethnicity that I myself belong to. Till this day this user is yet to comment on them . Hope we can find a soulution to everything and thank you again for helping me out. --Khanhamzakhan 19:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're not supposed to copy/paste to move a page. You're supposed to use the move tab at the top of the page. He should not have moved it without first discussing, you would not at all have been blocked for moving it back. However, you need to use the move tab to do so, so don't copy/paste to move pages, ok? That's all. Gscshoyru 19:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will keep that in mind --Khanhamzakhan 19:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Pax:Vobiscum 03:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Khanhamzakhan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The other user was constantly trying to blank out the page and I was restoring it I was preventing him to Vandalise the Pashtun Mafia.You can go ahead and look at the history to confirm it

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The other user was constantly trying to blank out the page and I was restoring it I was preventing him to Vandalise the [[Pashtun Mafia]].You can go ahead and look at the history to confirm it  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The other user was constantly trying to blank out the page and I was restoring it I was preventing him to Vandalise the [[Pashtun Mafia]].You can go ahead and look at the history to confirm it  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The other user was constantly trying to blank out the page and I was restoring it I was preventing him to Vandalise the [[Pashtun Mafia]].You can go ahead and look at the history to confirm it  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}