User talk:Rikara
Post your messages.
Help
How to I become a "established user"? -Rikara (talk) 20:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, you automatically become an established user after 4 days of account creation, so you just have to wait for 4 days! Hope this helps! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contribs) (Review) 21:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Truce
I'm willing to make a truce with you.--DarkFierceDeityLink 07:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:08fiesta.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:08fiesta.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 22:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- The 3RR Rule fails. -Rikara (talk) 22:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- You have been reported for violating 3RR. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 22:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
First off, 3RR is the biggest load of bullshit i've ever heard. Second, Maybe if you douches would READ THE DAMN EDIT SUMMARIES, this wouldn't happen. -Rikara (talk) 22:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
3RR, and Attacks. Please stop before some admin blocks you. Atomic Religione (talk) 22:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
What the hell is the point of 3RR? Wait, never mind. THERE IS NONE. NOW STOP ACTING LIKE AN IDIOT. -Rikara (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- And stop with the personal attacks, or else I *can* block you. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 22:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
How about YOU and AR stop pissing me off with your bullshit, and LISTEN TO ME FOR ONCE? -Rikara (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- We have listened to you, and found your arguments (a) unconvincing, (b) undefended, and (c) thuggish. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 22:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
No, you DIDNT. That's obvious. Now if you want me to be civil, then shut the fuck up and realize who's right and who's wrong. -Rikara (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
-Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 22:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Rikara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I shouldn't get punished for this. You guys weren't listening to me.
Decline reason:
Please review the civility policy and the three-revert rule. — Nakon 22:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was just about to do this! Darn. SLJCOAAATR 1 (talk) 22:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Rikara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
AGAIN! YOU DON'T LISTEN TO ME AGAIN! I was NOT being uncivil, and YOU violated 3RR as well! Yet there are members calling others "moron", "waste of sperm", etc, and they aren't being blocked! Besides, the 3RR rule has no point!
Decline reason:
reason — you're being uncivil again, and do you think yelling at us and not knowing policy will help you? — Rlevse • Talk • 22:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rikara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
YOU ARE NOT LISTENING TO ME. I am NOT being uncivil. And i do know the policies. I should not get punished for this.
Decline reason:
Your page has been protected for the remainder of your block for abusing this template. Please take the time to reconsider how you're approaching these articles, or you'll likely end up with further blocks. MastCell Talk 22:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- STOP BEING AN IDIOT. It's not motherfucking speculation, and i'm not "attacking" anyone. Now shut the fuck up, because you are wrong. AND LEAKERS ARE RELIABLE!~ NOW PLEASE SHUT THE HELL UP! YOU ARE WRONG. END OF STORY
Thats being civil? I don't think so. And nobody violated the 3RR except you, all your edits were reverted by multiple editors who did not violate WP:3RR. Dengarde ► Complaints 22:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
The recent edit you made to Miley Cyrus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 22:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC))
-facepalm- It's not vandalism. How is it? IT'S A TRUE EVENT. -Rikara (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Unprotected
Your page is now unprotected. Please keep the event that lead to its protection in mind. -- lucasbfr talk 22:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
"Reliable Leak"
Unless you can provide an official, published source. It's not going in the article. End of story. So please stop before you get blocked again. -Sukecchi (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC) It was a leak from a friend of a Nintendo Employee. Reliable? Yes. -Rikara (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- HAHA. No. ANYONE can say they're the relative of an employee! -Sukecchi (talk) 23:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
They are.LOOK. JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT WANT THOSE CHARACTERS IN DOES NOT MEAN THEY WON'T BE IN. -Rikara (talk) 23:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- And just because YOU want them in, that doesn't mean they're in. Tell you what, I'll let you in on a little secret! I'm a Nintendo Employee too! I've been working closely with Brawl, and I can safely say that Geno and Sora have not made it in. And, since I said I'm from Nintendo, I MUST Be reliable! Dengarde ► Complaints 23:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Your opinion is obviously baised. HERE. Only place i could find it. -Rikara (talk) 23:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, it was a forum post? Well, that changes EVERYTHING!!!
...oh wait, no it doesn't. This guy still has no proof. Dengarde ► Complaints 23:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, it was a forum post? Well, that changes EVERYTHING!!!
Oh my fucking god. I told you that's the only place they could be found. JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT WANT THEM IN DOESNT MEAN ITS FAKE. NOW QUIET. -Rikara (talk) 23:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Who said I didn't want them? I'd more more then pleased if Geno and Sora were in. But this isn't proof. Simple as that. Dengarde ► Complaints 23:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
-sigh- Yes. It.Is. Even look it up. -Rikara (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- sigh* Uncivility and 3RR Violating again huh? Very well, I'm going to report you now. Dengarde ► Complaints 23:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Uncivilty? No. And it might help if -gasp- YOU'D STOP REMOVING MY TALK PAGE COMMENTS! -Rikara (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- We would not remove them if they had not already deen discussed. Dengarde ► Complaints 23:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
It was not discussed before. I shouldn't get punished for YOUR vandalism. -Rikara (talk) 23:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- I would suggest you check the archive. It HAS been discussed. I'm done here, enjoy the rest of your block :)Dengarde ► Complaints 23:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
NO. It has NOT. This was a NEW ONE, if you would listen to me for once. -Rikara (talk) 23:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- We are not mirrors. We listen; but you, so far, have not. Do unto others, Rikara, or else you'll find yourself on the receiving end of an indefinite block. You've made a lot of administrators' bad lists. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 23:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
No, you guys do NOT listen to me. I'm getting treated like dog shit by you all. And I don't like it. MY TALK PAGE COMEMNTS WERE CONSTANTLY REMOVED. Block them for removing talk page comments. -Rikara (talk) 23:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Users have every right to remove posts unrelated to the subject, posts that are blatantly incivil, or posts that serve no other purpose than to troll. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 23:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes. So they didn't have a right to remove my comment from Talk:Super Smash Bros. (Series). It was on-subject, civil, and not trolling. -Rikara (talk) 23:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Blocked again
I have blocked you for a uncivil comment and personal attack during edit war. Please stay calm next time. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Hi there... Your edit summary here [1] was really very rude and immature. It's in violation of no personal attacks and the Wikipedia civility policy. Please don't do edit summaries like that again. I understand you may be frustrated, but we expect people to act like adults and behave nicely to each other when editing here. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
-facepalm- "shut up" isn't a personal attack. -Rikara (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Rikara (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First off, "shut up" is NOT a personal attack. Do you expect me to be NICE when i'm not getting listened to and having talk page comments that I make deleted? I shouldn't be punished for their vandalism.
Decline reason:
Read WP:CIVIL, WP:3RR, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:SPS, WP:NPA, and WP:AGF. — Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 23:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
-facepalm- "SHUT UP" IS NOT A PERSONAL ATTACK! You didn't even read what I wrote, did you This is fucking offensive. -Rikara (talk) 23:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- It is incivil, and if you carry on like this your talk page will once again be protected. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 23:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
It is not uncivil. I should NOT be punished for THEIR vandalism. And a user who is ACTUALLY being uncivil isn't getting punished! This IS offensive. I will NOT put up with it. -Rikara (talk) 23:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- YOU'RE the only one I've seen being incivil. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 23:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)