Jump to content

User talk:Nikki311

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by XenaAmazon (talk | contribs) at 04:01, 13 March 2008 (→Hi.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive
Archives

Questions about two articles

Hi, I was wondering if you would be able to look over a couple of articles when you have some free time. I added a WP:PW template to Callum Sprit, but I'm not convinced that he's notable. He's worked for a few promotions in Europe (most are redlinked) and won a few belts (all of which are redlinked). I didn't want to post this on the WP:PW talk page because that would most likely lead to deletion within the hour, but I was wondering what you thought. I generally oppose deletion, but the little content that does exist is so meaningless ("He has done a lot in 2 years." "He is a fun baby face.").

I am also wondering what to do with Triple X Wrestling (there is nothing pornographic about it). The article is cluttered with a bunch of sections, but I'm not sure which ones should just be removed. I think it could be a decent article, but it's a bit of a (fairly well-organized) mess right now. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox 2008

I understand were yer are comin' from, but I figured it'd be easier to have a second option that alittle different, kinda like WCW and the WWF. But I'm lettin' anyone who has a good idea on how to make it better edit it. Who know's, be kinda nice to have a "Sandbox Infobox Template" that we can experement with and see what we can do to make it better. Just a thought. --Crash Underride 00:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you noticed

That on WWE.com, they're promoting TNA Lockdown? O_o I just read earlier some rumour about the WWE website having been hacked. I guess that's what they're referring to: http://www.wwe.com/inside/industrynews/6544892

I wonder how long 'til it's fixed. Oh, and if it's not there when you read this, I have screenshots too. Bizarre. Th 2005 (talk) 17:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks like I was wrong. A couple of news sites (well, namely, ProWrestling.net, the new 'sister site' of PWTorch.com) are reporting that it's not a mistake. Apparently, the headlines and sources in "Industry News" are cherrypicked by an editor at WWE.com, presumably so as to not have bad press for WWE wind up in that part of the site. Still, it's weird that they'd promote TNA like that after taking that whole stance where they practically ignored every potshot, shoot and mere mention of them that happened in TNA. Every other headline on that section of the site is WWE-related except that one, too. Th 2005 (talk) 03:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving Your Talk Page

Would you like me to archive your talk page? Also would you like me to make you an automatic archive box?--TrUCo9311 21:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, thats fine by me. Now I fixed and cleaned up the event and aftermath section of No Way Out (2007) is it better now?--TrUCo-X 18:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh im sorry, I only wanted to keep the BG section as it was, as I was also cleaniing it up, but I think you reverted it right?--TrUCo-X 18:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diva pages

Thanks for letting me know. That would be a cool article to work on and I'm sure after you go through it, it will have a very good chance at GAN. I will also give it a pre-GA review when you're done. I'm not too sure when I will get stuck into another Diva article due to real life commitments but whenever I get some extended free time I will try to tackle one. It's getting more difficult now to choose an article to work on but I may attempt the Beth Phoenix page next. Oh, and I never had Dawn Marie Psaltis on my watchlist until a few days ago, but looking at the page it is very good. You should be proud of all the good work you do. - Deep Shadow 06:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a few days off this week and I was thinking that instead of getting started on Beth Phoenix's page, I would do an official GA review of Dawn Marie Psaltis as soon as you nominate it. I have never edited the article and I am not a member of WP:PW, so I feel that makes me an impartial reviewer. However, if you have any objections to me doing the review it is okay, I will not be offended. - Deep Shadow 04:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Rickard, and Vicotr Rivera

Who are they? What makes them notible enough for an article? I've watch wrestling for most of my life and NEVER ONCE heard of them. Also the links for the NWA titles on Peter Maivia's page, I think only one would be enough, because what's the point in linking them ALL to the exact same page? And once again you put the REFERENCES list in the "Notes" section, if it was a list of "notes" it would be "

not reference list. --Crash Underride 06:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, I coulda sworen that I left one of the titles linked to the NWA, and if not, sorry, I thought I did. Secondly, you're probably right that Rivera could get a page, now that you mentioned his tag run in the WWE, I do seem to remember the name, but not a face. As for Rickard, I honestly don't know about that, I would say that if he would have a link in the article is should just be in the infobox until then. --Crash Underride 18:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And I can live with Victor Rivera bein' linked. To help out, I'll do some searches and see what I can get on him and maybe work on a page for him. --Crash Underride 19:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Thank you so much for giving adding much needed fixes for Vengeance. I'd like to know if the wordings are correctly explained, per your suggestions at the peer review. Zenlax T C S 19:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making it more encyclopedic. Does it have a chance on becoming a Good article? Zenlax T C S 21:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do I wait no nominate or shall I do it now? Only reason I ask, is per here. Zenlax T C S 21:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the peer review reminder. Alright, I'll take your suggestions and wait. Thank you so much for responding to my call for Vengeance. :) Zenlax T C S 21:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think SummerSlam (2007) is now ready for GAN? I'm still going to wait the one week policy, but I would like you're opinion. --Cheers, LAX 00:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you still want me to wait until Monday? --Cheers, LAX 00:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
True. I just wanted your opinion. --Cheers, LAX 00:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Since no one responds on the project page, is it ok to create a template for defunct WWE Championships. I went ahead and created two examples in my sandbox. 1)Is it ok to create the template? 2)If so, which example is better?--TrUCo-X 21:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I created the first one.--TrUCo-X 18:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PW

I've been told you're a good reference point for all things wrestling: so with that in mind, would you like to do an interview for the Signpost's WikiProject report? Rudget. 15:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-03-10/WikiProject report - hopefully you won't mind doing three questions. :) Rudget. 11:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you accept Nikki, you can choose any three questions. I'd like three and four if possible. Cheers! iMatthew 2008 12:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which questions would you like to answer? iMatthew 2008 18:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nikki, please e-mail me A.S.A.P. There's a link in my browse bar. It's really important. iMatthew 2008 18:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I replied. iMatthew 2008 19:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. iMatthew 2008 19:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gives Nikki hard high-five iMatthew 2008 20:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've decided not to answer the interview after all (I feel very selfless, I am currently busy on an important homework project, and I simply feel too lazy to answer the interview questions). I'm having LAX take my spot. The Chronic 03:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll mention it iMatthew 2008 09:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Sockpuppet?

What makes you think that?--CiNnAmonCrUchy 19:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's not true.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 19:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What proof do you have?--CiNnAmonCrUchy 19:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's called a search engine.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 19:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How the hell is all that suspicious.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 19:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was in the bathroom, Who in the hell is Aaron.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 20:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I still see no proof. Have you have is the fact I provided a link to a banned users Photobucket account...big whoopee- friggin doo.--CiNnAmonCrUchy 20:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 21:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Heh

"TJ Spyke: The project has improved a lot over the last year, with some really talented editors (like NiciVampireHeart), and having two members become admins (Nikki311 and LAX)". Even after all this time I still fly so far under the radar I am practically invisible. –– Lid(Talk) 07:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stacy Keibler

Awesome. I will go over it this weekend as I have five days off work next week. I will do my best to give a thorough pre-GA review. - Deep Shadow 01:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Hi Nikki311. I left something on the Lisa Marie Varon talk page before I nominated it for featured article. Just wanted to let you know :)

XenaAmazon (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)XenaAmazon[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nikki311&oldid=197890198"