User talk:134.117.254.250

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 134.117.254.250, is registered to Carleton University and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

January 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Pythagoras on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 17:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has an encyclopedia of guidelines for new editors. Please view them as the censorship you speak of is approved. Thank you. Read me! --Colle 22:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2006

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. If you think the article is so bad come and edit it. It is hardly a character assasination if it is stating documented events in his life. Clealry you have access to the good side of Mr Hovind. Come and help the balance. David D. (Talk) 20:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of interest why would you be offended by criticism in Hovind's page? Here you seem to defend criticism. David D. (Talk) 20:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you are taking an interest. It is important that wikipedia articles are balanced so if you can bring another side to the table that is good. David D. (Talk) 21:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2006

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Vary | Talk 22:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

To whoever is using this ip to help with the rushton article - thank you for your help, and willingness to work on organization! It might help if you created an account on wikipedia so we could discern your edits from others coming from the university. I'm thinking about taking a really big swipe at organization next, but I'll wait until you've settled a few more edits before jumping in and maybe losing stuff. --JereKrischel 19:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could you help me out, and apply just the changes you think should be made to the race hypothesis section? I think the you ended up bashing the cite for his book, an NPOV caption to an image, and ended up expanding a few laundry lists that should be kept short. We can continue our conversation on the Talk:J. Philippe Rushton page for the details, but a blanket revert isn't helping us find common ground. Thanks! --JereKrischel 00:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and just to be clear, I'm trying to leave the back and forth arguing into the Critiques section so it doesn't meander, and leave just the basic outline of his hypothesis in the description section. Can we move the defenses into the critique sections? Thanks! --JereKrischel 00:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for humoring me and helping me through the edits! I hope things are looking better - sorry if we got off on the wrong foot. Working point by point, and understanding your concerns is helping me a great deal! Thanks! --JereKrischel 01:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2006

Your recent edit to WiMAX (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to WiMAX, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Strom 00:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Wireless, you will be blocked from editing. Sylent 23:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Southern rock, you will be blocked from editing. - Gilliam 21:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 200 7

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Uduvil, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. James086^{Talk | Email} 01:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Radio-frequency identification. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Dinah Shore (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 00:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kazakhstan, you will be blocked from editing. VegitaU 16:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2007

Your recent edit to Ford Mustang (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 15:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy ^talk 03:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since the Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents have opted to take no action [1] I'll reply to their comment here.

[2] Changing first-lien, as referred to by the inline reference, to first-line, changing the meaning. Careless or nuisance editing.

[3] 2007- What is the What: Author- Unknown.- Memoirs of a lost boy and his experiences as a refugee in the United States. Breach of WP:VERIFY

[4] after a change in ownership. The Stallions have produced many great players to the NHL, AHL, and to play around the world. Breach of WP:PEACOCK & WP:VERIFY

[5] Students were not informed of the strike until it was occuring and councillors on the CUSA board complained executives had painted a different picture of what the situation actually was. Breach of WP:VERIFY

[6] Sidney Crosby was charged with bestiality claiming it gave him strength. Breach of WP:BLP

-- John (Daytona2 · talk) 14:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Social psychology, you will be blocked from editing. Poeloq (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Social psychology, you will be blocked from editing. Nick123 ^(t/c) 19:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Your recent edit to John Tory (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to John Tory (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to John Tory (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to John Tory (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

--Nlu (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Steam trap has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Heliocentrism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Heliocentrism was changed by 134.117.254.250 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-11T02:31:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Anatomy. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anatomy was changed by 134.117.254.250 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-11T02:34:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Porsche, you will be blocked from editing. — Typ932^{T | C} 21:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

note

This is a shared IP address at Carleton University...I was just assigned the address by the library DHCP server, and saw this "new messages" thing pop up while browsing. Posting stuff in here re. vandalism will undoubtedly not get to the person you're trying to talk to; they're long gone.

Is there really so childish people in university? how old are they? --— Typ932^{T | C} 23:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Moore v. the Regents of the University of California, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Moore v. the Regents of the University of California was changed by 134.117.254.250 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-26T17:59:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.