Jump to content

User talk:Alientraveller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.237.48.113 (talk) at 21:05, 9 June 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives: 1234567891011

What the hell dude!

Why did you take down that info I had on the Joker in the Dark Knight, he sports a ****ing Glasgow smile!!User:Kazaan

Worked

I'm really please that worked! ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 10:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Gi Joe

Go see a reliable sources has been added before making a revert. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, According to your latest entry you have added this link. That link shows LatinoReview site. Which is the same site which confirmed Brendan Fraser has Gung Ho and The Rock has Shipwreck. It is confirmed that BF is Gung Ho. Why do you keep reverting?. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then IMDB lists Brendan Fraser has Gung Ho?. And what do you mean by "bitching three wheeled motorcycle"?--SkyWalker (talk) 12:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks, Keep up the good work on movies entry. --SkyWalker (talk) 13:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Sparrow

Shouldn't we give him the title of protagonist in addition to Anti-Hero? BlackPearl14Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 23:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but that makes this unequal: the Elizabeth Swann article names her protagonist. Just thought I should get your input :) BlackPearl14Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 16:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good question...perhaps a removal might be in order... BlackPearl14Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 16:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I'll just check to make sure that it's been removed on the Elizabeth Swann and Will Turner pages. Thanks! BlackPearl14Pirate Lord-ess of the Caribbean 18:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oy! wall-e had his page moved

So Gears of War decided to move the Wall-E page to WALL • E, without checking the archive where the hyphen use (or non-use) had already been discussed with the decision to keep it as - was made. Your assistance in putting it back, assuming you agree that moving it back is the right choice, is appreciated. SpikeJones (talk) 03:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers 2

They aren't rumors. The are confirmed. If you had bothered to read the Talk Page on that article you would see my sources. Kalas Grengar (talk) 17:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning of impending violations of Wikipedia's 3RR policy

Please do not engage in Wikipedia:Edit warring; in editing The Dark Knight (film), you are verging on violating Wikipedia:3RR. Your edit summaries are not accurate; it is not a copyright violation to link to a reliable third-party published source such as Allocine.fr, which reproduces the text that you cited (initially in a misleading way). Only by examining the text does it become clear that the previous presentation was misleading. A quotation in the citation will solve that problem as well. I'll try to provide it a bit later if I can find the time. See the article's talk page and please use it rather than edit warring for discussions. Edit warring is a violation of Wikipedia editing policies and guidelines. --NYScholar (talk) 21:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack sparrow

Concerning your revert to Jack Sparrow, I understand what you are doing, but the summary was not specific enough, and a newcomer would likely be very confused by it. In the future, try to be a bit more specific in your edit summaries to avoid confusion.

Best, --Mizu onna sango15/珊瑚15 21:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your hard work on The Dark Knight too. --NYScholar (talk) 23:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My work on Hulk (film)

You can head over to User:Wildroot/Hulk and do a little editing. That would pretty nice. Cheers. Maybe I might be able to get that article in shape for GA before the new film comes out.—Wildroot (talk) 01:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jurassic Park 4

Good call on removing that stuff, I didn't have the guts to do it myself. Ben Boldt (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Legend of Spyro

Yup such film is under production [1],[2],--SkyWalker 15:19, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I thought you might like to know this

Monday, on the main page: Jurassic Park (film). - Face 19:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, Persion Poet Gal protected it for some reason. - Face 19:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ta

...for the Barnstar. I do that, copyedit upcoming FAs o' de day. Nice work, not too rah-rah for such a lunatic praiseworthy fanatical cinephile as you seem to be. Congrats. --Milkbreath (talk) 17:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You should be aware of this thread which involves you. At present, I do not see any major civility violations. I would probably advise not to put comments such as "thanks for the edit conflict" in the edit summary, as it can come across as if you are blaming people for something they have no control over. Also, if you are getting edit conflicts, there is a lot of conversation going on and it is possible other people are getting edit conflicts and could be frustrated as well, so it's just an altogether bad time to be cheeky :) --Jaysweet (talk) 13:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]