Talk:Rebecca DiPietro

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rebecca DiPietro article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This professional wrestling article is a frequent target for editors to add a week-by-week synopsis of storyline events, unconfirmed information, rumors, and other content inappropriate to an encyclopedic article. Please make sure to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not, and consider whether your additions to this article will serve to make the article larger and harder to edit for style, clarity, and grammar.

Professional wrestling Start‑class Low‑importance

	Rebecca DiPietro is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Rebecca dating Batista

I just want to know why this is a rumor and not fact. That is all. Some of these wrestling news sites receive their information from insiders within the WWE.

"It’s said that Dave Batista is currently dating a Diva under contract with WWE, and The W365 Newsletter reports that his new love interest is none other than the recently signed Diva Search loser Rebecca DiPietro." 8/23/2006

"Batista is in the process of getting divorced and is now dating Rebecca from this year's Diva Search. A lot of the agents and workers on Smackdown have not been too impressed with Batista's work since his return. The majority feel like he's not even trying at this point." 8/27/2006

Both quotes taken from WrestleZone.com

Because it is totally obvious that these sites got their quotes from other internet sites!! They have the SAME INFORMATION on each site, the same words and everything!!! They are just copying what they see on other websites. I doubt any of them heard this from Batista or Rebecca, but probably one person posted this as stupid information, another site thought it was real and posted it, another site copied that and posted it, etc.... This is unconfirmed information and it will remain that way until one of the two confirms it! Please, whoever keeps posting this on Wikipedia, STOP!!! It can be considered Vandalism!!! (Just WAIT patiently...if the two ARE dating, pictures and confirmations will eventually turn up! If not, there will be nothing more to discuss on this matter, other than some sites are stupid by copying off of others, will there?--Cookie 21:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then how come on edge Wikipedia page it say he dating Lita when he really married supermike

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]