User talk:S3000

Talk: S3000

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Village of westward Ho!

Hi

I don't agree with the use of the word TOWN regarding Westward Ho! It has never had a Market therefore it can only be known as a Village.

Bramanfiles.

Douche?

Dear S3000, Be you a douchecock? I believe it doubly so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.252.211.130 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Srinagar

i am editing srinagar as it is not mentioning the fact that the city lies within admiministered and disputed territory just like Mirpur please do not revert or vandalise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nangparbat (talk • contribs) 16:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

???

i have not removed the azad kashmir tag because srinagar now also contains it fight over bye bye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nangparbat (talk • contribs) 17:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean?? Please be more specific.. I can't make head or tail of what you're trying to convey! S3000 ☎ 11:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nakhudas/Tadkeshwar

Hey, I am a Nakhuda living in England and recently read your Nakhuda article. I am eager to know about where you got your information from - are you from Tadkeshwar yourself? I started creating a website for Tadkeshwar and if you could tell me where your info. is from, that'd help me with that too. The articles were great, by the way.

KarateKid (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nangparbat

Hi, I got your message but apparantly when there is an "Obvious, disruptive sock puppet", using the checkuser is "unacceptable" and the solution they recommend is "Block, no checkuser needed". I'm not sure what to do... [[User:Giani g|Giani g]] (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

on using trivia template

Hello! I have found you used trivia template in Get a Clue. And I feel there are 2 misusages of the template. So I write it here.

This template should be used not as {{subst trivia}} but as{{trivia}}.
Date parameter should be added to the template like {{trivia|date=August 2008}}

Thank you! Penpen (talk) 22:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genelia D'Souza

Hey, it was nice to see your intermittent reverts on Ms. D'Souza's article page. However, I saw your edit summary which spoke about her date of birth. Accordingly, you seem to be under the impression that IMDB is not regarded as a reliable source. Hence from the existing RS, no one really knows what her DOB is. I've been trying to track it down, but to no avail. Please bear this in mind while reverting DOB edits. For all reasons, the edits by some of these anons might be correct. Mspraveen (talk) 10:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fair enough to me. Though IMDB is a non-reliable source, it is the closest we can get at the moment. Keep up the good work so far. Btw, nice to meet you. Mspraveen (talk) 16:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substing

Hi, just a heads up that subst:'ing maintenance templates (such as {{:trivia}}) causes User:SmackBot so flag the pages as having invalid date parameters [1] so it is preferable not to subst maintenance templates. Thanks, ~ AmeIiorate _{U T C} @ 00:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. S3000 ☎ 09:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bias

86.153.130.184 is a pro pakistani vandalizing articles. another user claimed he is a sock of a user called Nangparbat. please see [2] and [3]. help please. he is inserting pakistani argument everywhere n remove indian ones. he write administered near kashmir (india) n removes for pakistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.31.145 (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nangparbat

Please go ahead and add any more active IPs to User:Hersfold/Vandal watch#Nangparbat, taking care to keep them in sorted order to make rangeblocks easier to determine and marking the new ones with (active). I'm going to go to ANI about this - I'm not certain about a rangeblock a second time around, as this is a very commonly used network in the UK, and he is bouncing around a bit as you can see. Hopefully we'll get an end to this soon, although any measure we do is likely to be temporary, as it was last time. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 13:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is that we're dealing with a huge network. Most of these IP addresses should be stable, but Nangparbat has apparently found out how to force his IP to change sooner than it should. As a result, any IP address we block is going to be someone else within a few minutes, and any range we block is going to be filled with innocent users within a day or two. I know last time it seemed to work well enough, but we probably blocked off hundreds of other people who didn't bother to protest the block.

What we can do is contact the ISP through an abuse report and make them aware of the situation. With any luck, they'll be able to do something on their end to stop this. Until then, we're more or less limited to blocking each IP for a short time as they come up. It's annoying and not as effective, I know, but we also have to consider what we're doing to other users looking to join. Sorry. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 15:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian administered Kashmir

just like you said the real name for Indian administered kashmir is Jammu and kashmir the real name for Pakistan administered kashmir is Azad kashmir this is not mentioned in jammu and kashmir article the jammu and kashmir article states it as pakistan administered kashmir while when i put the same on northern areas you revert why do you have this constant undying bias ? 86.162.67.217 (talk) 17:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC) this is a small issue made big for no reason its just a couple sentences lol not whole essays and to keep in with neutrality this must be done 86.162.67.217 (talk) 18:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]