Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Dick

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sgeureka (talk | contribs) at 20:22, 30 October 2008 (→Blind Dick: Delete/Redirect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Blind Dick

Blind Dick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its film through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 23:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep on the grounds of TTN making way too many AfD nominations. I would recommend a maximum of three a day. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge I always think it better to judge on the quality of the articles & the nominations, not individuals who may have authored them or nominated them . In this case, although the film, Cool Hand Luke is extremely notable(bering on the National Film Registry]], this is a very peripheral character and inappropriate for an individual article--unless there has been significant commentary on him, which I would tend to doubt & even if there is some, I still think it would be better as part of a more comprehensive article. The problem with the multiple nominations of this sort is it obscures these actual distinctions. We can deal with any reasonable number of good well presented nominations, while one cookie-cutter nomination without specifics is one too many. DGG (talk) 02:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect/Do not merge The article on the movie Cool Hand Luke does not have any sections on characters. A merge would result in a secondary character having his own character section. It would be the only character section in the article while main characters do without. The content from this Blind Dick article is badly written and there are no sources listed at all. A merge will only reduce the quality of the main article and it will not add anything to it. I suggesting redirecting to the Cast section. DDDtriple3 (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete/Redirect One-off characters rarely ever need separate articles. This one reads WP:OR-ish, which is bad for a merger per DDDtriple3. – sgeureka t•c 20:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Blind_Dick&oldid=248680839"