Jump to content

Talk:Camelopardalis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PlanetStar (talk | contribs) at 01:12, 7 January 2009 (Revert to revision 254607064 dated 2008-11-28 14:21:55 by Rursus using popups). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAstronomy Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAstronomy Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGreece Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Invented"? How does somebody invent a constellation? RickK 08:32, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

"Created" is probably a better term. JYolkowski 22:02, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Or "newly designated" or "newly identified". ~~~~ 20:29, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"Invented" seems better than "recorded" to me. The latter seems to imply (wrongly) that constellations are sitting there waiting to be discovered and named, like stars or planets! Gdr 19:17, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

They are! If planets and stars sit awaiting being discovered, then the constellations are too. Rursus 19:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bah, we don't invent stars or planets. Locations of stars are of course natural, but star patterns are purely human inventions. Especially those which are created only to fill empty space between the older and more conspicuous patterns. Unless you'er one of those who believe that a piece of artwork already exist somewhere and the job of an artist is to discover it. ;)--JyriL talk 23:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greek myth

The article says:

However, as a desert, together with other features in the Zodiac sign of Gemini (i.e. the Milky Way, and the constellations Gemini, Orion, Auriga, and Canis Major), this may be the origin of the myth of the cattle of Geryon, which forms one of The Twelve Labours of Herakles.

I'm intrigued. What's the evidence for this claim? Gdr 19:17, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barfable visualisation

Those extremely ugly visualisations with lots of odd and sharp angles, besides being impossible to use in an amateur astronomer context (the only context when they are actually used), where does it come from? It's by all means certain that it is quite ahistoric, besides bugging me, and possibly also being laughable. Said: Rursus 20:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mythology

Partially incorrect:

Camelopardalis has no mythology associated with its stars, as it is a modern constellation,

Hevelius associated it with the camel that Rebecka rode throught the desert to Isaac. Hevelius'es story is far fetched, since he assumes Camelopardalis is a camel, not a giraffe, but he is not that far from the desert/tent depiction that has been suggested being the Arabs depiction of the area of Camelopardalis. Said: Rursus () 14:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I mean Jacob Bartsch. Said: Rursus () 14:21, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]