User talk:Scartol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This user has composed a funky hip-hop track about Wikipedia.
|
| Scartol | Biography | Talk | WikiThoughts | Drawing Board | ||||
|
is not |
|
| 2007 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2011
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec edit |
Copyediting request
Hi, I am wondering if you have time to copyedit this article. It has failed twice at FAC and is currently at FAC again. It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks—Chris! ct 01:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
: 30 March 2009
- From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
- Special report: Community weighs license update
- News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The article has received a thorough copyedit. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking another look at it? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 08:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC))
- Have you had another look at the article after its recent copyedit? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC))
- Hello again. You didn't respond to my last question. The article has underwent another copyedit. Have you had time to take another look at it? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 23:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC))
- Discogs only refers to Mo' Wax issuing the album as a triple LP. To phrase it to state that the label only issued the album that way might read a bit clunky. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 20:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC))
- I rewrote the CD/Double LP/Triple LP sentence, since it was a bit awkward. Do you have any other specific areas you've noticed need improvement? I become wary when you state you have concerns about the prose style. Changing the voice in which an article is written of course needs a rewrite of the entire article; with a FAC I would first want to discuss it with everyone involved. This could certainly take longer than the FAC process allows. So, while keeping the current style, can you spotlight any other areas which need attention? RevZoe (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Delayed response
Responded at my talk page...finally. :) Awadewit (talk) 03:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Lisa the Vegetarian
That would be great, thank you! :) I was actually going to ask you to do it a while ago because you did such a good work on the Sideshow Bob and Phil Hartman articles, but then I noticed that you weren't accepting copyedit requests anymore. :P Cheers, TheLeftorium 18:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, indeed it does! :) TheLeftorium 21:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
: 6 April 2009
- Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
- News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
- WikiProject report: WikiProject China
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Riven
Thanks. I have to admit, I haven't actually played the game... just watched all gajillion video walkthroughs on YouTube :P I have to agree though; taken together the games have a nice arc, but in particular Riven just has more gravity (I think in part due to the superb music.) Happy editing, --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 13:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Only ever played Myst and Exile, but Revelation did look a tad kooky to me and from watching the vids for End of Ages I didn't think it had a very good ending, unfortunately. Oh wells, I still got FAs out of them :P --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
MemChu revisited
Hey Scar, how's it goin'? I've gone back to Stanford Memorial Church in order to bring it to FAC. Over the weekend (hope you had a nice Easter!) I added some content about its architecture. Would you mind taking another gander, especially the Architecture section? I'm afraid that my lack of knowledge about the subject has affected the section. In addition to elicting your help, I'm gonna find some experts, like I did with the Organ section. Do you think that Awadewit would take a look, even though lit is her thing? Thanks. --Christine (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)