Jump to content

User talk:63.3.5.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Thing That Should Not Be (talk | contribs) at 22:21, 12 May 2009 (Message re. Cape of Good Hope (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Regarding your disruptive edits to Wikipedia

  1. Thank you for experimenting with the page The Real World: Denver on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — Seadog 02:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Real World: Denver. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 23:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Bigfoot, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Mad Max 21:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to John Cabot, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- KirinX 06:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Scottish clan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Thisisbossi 03:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MOOO!

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. SatuSuro 23:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Kiss (band), you will be blocked from editing. Special-T 01:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Dallas Sidekicks, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 15:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Milwaukee Wave

Do you have a source or a reference to this comment by Steve Ryan? I don't see anything on the MISL or Milwaukee Wave's websites stating this. Wildthing61476 20:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Battle of the Labyrinth, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Battle of the Labyrinth was changed by 63.3.5.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-01T03:57:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - DiligentTerrier and friends 13:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not revert my edits any more. My posts are signed automatically -- Wikipedia bots automatically do that. My edits are plainly not vandalism and I do not appreciate your careless use of the term.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National Federation of Republican Assemblies. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I would suggest discussing your changes on the talk page. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 14:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Accusation of sockpuppetry

You have made an accusation of sockpuppetry at Talk:National Federation of Republican Assemblies. That is a serious accusation and must be supported by evidence. Otherwise it is a personal attack and a violation of civility. Please provide evidence or stop. Sbowers3 (talk) 16:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You have violated the three-revert rule. The rule states:

An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time.

Even if you don't use the "Undo" button and even if you make different changes each time, you are still violating 3RR when you change the work of other editors more than 3 times in 24 hours. And lest you think that your edits are okay because you are reverting vandalism, let me caution you that your reverts do NOT qualify as reverting vandalism. Sbowers3 (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Federation of Republican Assemblies Mediation

I see that you have been involved in a dispute about the National Federation of Republican Assemblies. For your information the mediation case has been closed (I believe wrongly) and have requested that it be reopened, meanwhile if you are interested in following the case you can find it here. Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies --Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 06:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Texas, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 00:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2008

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 06:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of Fort Sumter, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of Fort Sumter was changed by 63.3.5.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-05-13T02:09:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Public Broadcasting Service. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gladys J Cortez 21:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chocolate milk has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.   jj137 (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Chocolate milk constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.   jj137 (talk) 02:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chocolate milk. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.   jj137 (talk) 02:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chocolate milk. ukexpat (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ashanti (singer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 02:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Toni Jo Abbenante Farmer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 06:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Otis Boykin has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewimage&friendid=397357423&albumid=1350764&imageid=17341289"). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Alex Wolff has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Versus22 talk 20:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of drug films has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 21:54, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Cape of Good Hope has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 22:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]