Talk:Paul Mavrides

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Comics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've got some reservations about the truthfulness of this article. Also, was the Mavrides gene-line in Bruce Sterling's novel Schismatrix a reference to Paul? Wellspring 21:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What's your question? Mavrides does exist, I have some of his comics in my collection. --SpinyNorman 04:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this article is fairly valid. I know a bit about Mavrides, he's a bonafide artist.--Knucmo2 11:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though I don't know the full publishing history of the Freak Brothers, this bio seems to be on the level (though I'm not sure he was really born in 1962, hence the question mark). How do we get rid of that tag?

I would not be at all surprised if Sterling was alluding to Mavrides. Nareek 22:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've got some reservations about this article. In fact, I must object. This article is far too accurate, and that is simply not in keeping with the subject matter. We need more LIES. ZachsMind 04:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LIES

The evidence is quite puzzling. why would Paul allow the truth to be told about him unless there was a deeper, hidden truth which was in direct contradiction to the facts? Palmer V. Eldritch has said "you dont want to know more, have some Twinkies". ive said too much already, the xists are. . . Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]