Jump to content

Air ioniser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alvis (talk | contribs) at 05:42, 17 February 2010 (→‎Consumer Reports court case: removed old uncited). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

An air ionizer (or negative ion generator) is a device that uses high voltage to ionize (electrically charge) air molecules. Negative ions, or anions, are particles with one or more extra electrons, conferring a net negative charge to the particle. Cations are positive ions missing one or more electrons, resulting in a net positive charge. Most commercial air purifiers are designed to generate negative ions. Another type of air ionizer is the ESD ionizer (balanced ion generator) used to neutralize static charge.

Ionic air purifiers

Air ionizers are used in air purifiers. Airborne particles are attracted to the electrode in an effect similar to static electricity. These ions are de-ionized by seeking earthed conductors, such as walls and ceilings. To increase the efficiency of this process, some commercial products provide such surfaces within the device. The frequency of nosocomial infections in British hospitals prompted the National Health Service (NHS) to research the effectiveness of anions for air purification.[1] Recent SARS outbreaks have fueled the desire for personal ionizers in the Far East, including Japan (where many products have been specialized to contain negative ion generators, including toothbrushes, refrigerators, air conditioners, air cleaners and washing machines). There are no specific standards for these devices. Notebook producers ASUS have now started to include air ionizers in their computers[2].

Ions versus ozone

Ionisers should not be confused with ozone generators, even though both devices operate in a similar way. Ionisers use electrostatically charged plates to produce positively or negatively charged gas ions that particulate matter sticks to (in an effect similar to static electricity). Ozone generators are optimised to attract an extra oxygen ion to an O2 molecule, using either a corona discharge tube or UV light. Even the best ionisers will produce a small amount of ozone, and ozone generators will produce gaseous ions of molecules other than ozone (unless fed by pure oxygen, not air).[citation needed]

At high concentrations, ozone can also be toxic to air-borne bacteria, and may destroy or kill these sometimes infectious organisms. However, the needed concentrations are toxic enough to humans and animals that the FDA explicitly demands ozone therapy not be used as medical treatment,[3] and has taken action against businesses that fail to comply with this regulation.[4] Pure ozone is a highly toxic and extremely reactive gas.[5] A higher daily average than 0.1 ppm (0.2 mg/m³) is not recommended and can damage the lungs and olfactory bulb cells directly.[6]

Consumer Reports court case

Consumer Reports, a non-profit U.S.-based product-testing magazine, reported in October 2003 that air ionizers do not perform to high enough standards compared to conventional HEPA air filters. The exception was a combination unit that used a fan to move air while ionizing it. In response to this report, The Sharper Image, a manufacturer of air ionizers (among other products), sued Consumer's Union (the publishers of Consumer Reports) for product defamation. Consumer Reports gave the Ionic Breeze and other popular units a "fail" because they have a low Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR). CADR measures the amount of filtered air circulated during a short period of time, and was originally designed to rate media-based air cleaners. The Sharper Image claimed that this test was a poor way to rate the Ionic Breeze, since it does not take into account other features, such as 24-hour a day continuous cleaning, ease of maintenance, and silent operation. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California subsequently struck down The Sharper Image's complaint and dismissed the case, reasoning that The Sharper Image had failed to demonstrate that it could prove any of the statements made by Consumer Reports were false. The Court's final ruling in May 2005 ordered The Sharper Image to pay $525,000 USD for Consumer Union's legal expenses.[7]

Negative Ion Treatment for Seasonal Affective Disorder

Published research shows that high levels of negative ions are a useful treatment for Seasonal affective disorder[8] if the negative ions are in sufficient density (quantity). Note that this is a separate issue from air cleaning claims or ozone generation that happens in some devices that also generate negative ions.

One of the pioneers in this area is Michael Terman, Ph.D., Director of the Center for Light Treatment and Biological Rhythms at Columbia University Medical Center and director of the Clinical Chronobiology Program at New York State Psychiatric Institute. As described in Psychiatry Online[8], Terman and several coworkers obtained preliminary evidence that a simulated dawn could reduce the symptoms of seasonal affective disorder. As a side effect of their research, they learned that high-density negative air ionization could have the same effect. Clinical research has been published through Columbia University, American Journal of Psychiatry/APA, 2006[9] and Archives of General Psychiatry, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1998[10] and Journal of Alternative Complementary Medicine, Columbia University 1995.[11]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Air ionizers wipe out hospital infections". The New Scientist. Retrieved 2006-08-30.
  2. ^ http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=0Tc42s23bOdbbvY5
  3. ^ "TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS; CHAPTER I--FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; SUBCHAPTER H--MEDICAL DEVICES". U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) website. Retrieved 2006-08-30.
  4. ^ Kurtzweil P (1999). "Ozone generators generate prison terms for couple". FDA Consum. 33 (6): 36–7. PMID 10628316.
  5. ^ "Ozone: Good Up High, Bad Nearby". Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Website. Retrieved 2006-08-30.
  6. ^ "Ozone Generators that are Sold as Air Cleaners: An Assessment of Effectiveness and Health Consequences". EPA Website. Retrieved 2006-08-30.
  7. ^ "Sharper Image pays $525,000 to end lawsuit against CU". Consumer Reports. 2006-08-06.
  8. ^ a b http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/42/1/25
  9. ^ http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/163/12/2126
  10. ^ Archives of General Psychiatry, 1998. 1998;55:875-882
  11. ^ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9395604?dopt=Abstract
Look up ionizer in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Air_ioniser&oldid=344562199"