Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quzeyli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ktr101 (talk | contribs) at 15:40, 26 May 2010 (→‎Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: declined it). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Quzeyli

Quzeyli (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quzeyli/Archive.



25 May 2010


Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Sardur

The case is still the same: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quzeyli/Archive. Pro memoria: following the last SPI, 1 week block + 1RR for three months on Armenian monasteries articles for the master (Quzeyli), which is also limited to one account and may not edit through IPs. 48 hours for each IP.
Articles's histories: Yeghishe Arakyal Monastery, Amaras Monastery, Tsitsernavank Monastery, Gandzasar monastery.

  1. While Quzeyli didn't edit the concerned articles, one of the IPs (144.122.135.88) re-started the revert war on the same articles and for the same (addressed on pdd) reason. I've been told in the same SPI that the IP was a sock/meat; perhaps it's time to be sure of it.
  2. Yexeqnadzor contributed for the 1st time today, on the 4 mentioned monasteries (and only there), with the same argument, and during two minutes (i.e. immediately finding the four of them). A clear sock, imho.

Sardur (talk) 11:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Sardur (talk) 11:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Looks like a duck to me. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]