User talk:Atif.t2

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2009/October/Thu; 2009/October/Mon; 2010/June/Wed;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Nia Lyte/Wikipedia

Hello Atif,

I email you a request please read it and feel free to contact me. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinca (talk • contribs) 18:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your email has been replied to you regarding the request. Atif.t2 (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Clock

I am in Love with your Clock, although currently I can not change it to my Time zone, in fact I don't even know what System you used. If you could just edit in the time zones for EST, United States.

My local time:

November 2024

8

Friday

3:22 pm IST

Just format it to EST. Thanks.

Rttam (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Glad you liked it. I use IST time zone. I am posting two clocks in EST time zone. One is with Daylight Saving Time and the other is not. Pick the one you want. Thanks Atif.t2 (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My local time:

November 2024

8

Friday

4:52 am EST

With Daylight Saving Time

My local time:

November 2024

8

Friday

5:52 am EST

Atif.t2 (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey Mate, it seems that the Clock has stopped, I last edited it at 6:44 PM (My Userpage, now redone) and I just checked, it was still there. - I had to re-enter the code, in order for it too work. Rttam (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well the clock seems to work fine on both my user page and the talk page. Maybe your browser didn't refresh the page. Anyway if it still doesn't work leave me a message and I will see what is the issue. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remember the page has to be refreshed to display the current time. If you just leave your page the time will not change. This means whenever anyone will check the page the time shown will be your current time. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally you can purge the clock to show the current time by clicking on the date shown in the clock. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your clock seems to work fine now since I have purged it. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much thanks, Atif.t2. And thanks for the help. :) Rttam ^TN_C 17:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Law & Order Articles and Article Additions

Thank you for the feedback. I see what you mean by the Simpsons articles.

I started by noticing on the List of Law & Order episodes page that even shorter articles had already been created with only the six main cast members and the short summaries. Since these shorter articles had been created and not challenged, I added guest cast to them and then created other articles by following the same pattern.

Now that at least some of my additions have been reversed, these articles remain in their originally shorter form. I will add more detail to my future submissions. But I'm not clear as to why these originally skeleton articles were created or remain unchanged.

````Jdlankin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdlankin (talk • contribs) 05:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jdlankin, You can always actively edit the article and make it better. Please add one of the templates on this page while editing. If your edits are reverted follow it up with the persons who reverted it or you can also discuss it in the articles talk page. The articles may have been left like that by the editor due to lack of information. Thanks for contributing. Atif.t2 (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for all your vandal fighting! $Pikiwyn$ `^talk` 19:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Atif.t2 (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage vandalism

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage yesterday. It's my first userpage vandal, so now I qualify as a real Wikipedian! Besides, now I know that someone's looked at my page other than me. As a token of my appreciation, I undid vandalism to your page. A. Parrot (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting out some sneaky vandalism that i obviously missed. Glad there are others like you nuking the vandals. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saw

Hello, Atif.t2 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to the Saw film series. I'd like to invite you to become a part of Wikipedia: WikiProject Saw, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of Saw and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Ground Z3R0 002 02:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:55, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Courcelles, for the rights, Will do my best to have the queue clear.. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Photography is not and cannot be 'art'. How did that get on here? (I am a photographer, by the way.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.23.119.186 (talk) 21:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]As requested on your talk page, please wait for consensus before deleting sections from an article without an edit summary. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]TUSC token 42100ccedf4d1ad2cef4e588138ab6eaI am now proud owner of a TUSC account!MF DOOM PAGEThis person keep undoing factual information. He is deleting information by one artist and not others showing that this is a personal attack. IP address is 74.176.122.147 I saw you did correct it before and I had to go back and change it again today. Please ban this person. Flavaguy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavaguy (talk • contribs) 15:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]Hi Flavaguy, I could only find his previous edits, is he using any other accounts!! if so please report him as a sockpuppet or as i am not an admin get help at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Atif.t2 (talk) 16:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]