User talk:BLGM5

Welcome!

Hello, BLGM5! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Closedmouth (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Regarding recent edits to Colin Cowherd

Please consider discussing this edit on the talk page, of the article, I reverted my revert for now, but you should discus this on the talk page, enjoy editing, and you are welcome MaenK.A._Talk 16:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you didnt had to revert your message, its ok, I didnt pay attention to your edit summery at first :-) MaenK.A._Talk 16:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Logorama

Hi, I reverted your recent edit at Logorama. I'm not a fan of that list of brands either, but calling for reliable sources is not an appropriate reason to remove it. Please re-read WP:V. Sources are only required for contentious material, and for quotes. Uncontroversial material apparent to any viewer of the film in question does not need to be sourced. If you're disputing it because you think it's WRONG, that's another matter, but a lack of sources isn't a policy-supported reason to delete. Perhaps try attacking it on WP:TRIVIA grounds, I think there's still some leverage to be had there. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the tag you've just added seems like a reasonable compromise as we can probably all agree that the article in general could be better sourced. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're such a nice guy. Things like this endear you to people when you run for administrator! BLGM5 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Hansbrough

Your AfD nomination of Ben Hansbrough was incomplete. If you wish to finish the nomination, please create the discussion page (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Hansbrough) and list your reasons for deletion there. Thank you. — Rankiri (talk) 15:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beat you to it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to provide your reasoning at the AFD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deus ex machina

Sorry, thought I was reverting the IP. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Motorola Droid - advertising language

Hi - I'd like to address both our concerns about the so-called "interactive experience" used as a marketing tool by Verizon in its release of this device. Please see the talk page. Thanks! ☯ Z.S. ☠ ......(talk) 18:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan

How is it randomly tagging? Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tags like the ones you added need defending on the Talk Page. Something like {{plot}} or {{unreferenced}} are self-explanatory. Others need specific arguments for use. BLGM5 (talk) 12:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or it can be explained in the edit summary, which is what I did. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Perhaps"? doesn't count. Good try though! BLGM5 (talk) 11:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: TtH

Hi BLGM5, you'll have to start a new AfD. The article as it is now is different to the version that was deleted in October 2006. I found the article while leafing through the deleted contributions of Conversion script, and just decided to undelete the old versions per the advice at this section of DRV. Graham87 02:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start a new AfD, thanks for the input. BLGM5 (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Machete (film)

Hello. Letting you know, as I'm sure you know, you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war on the Machete (film) page. I suggest you stop, seek discussion on the talk page, otherwise you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Akerans (talk) 07:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everclear

I have reverted your recent edit of Everclear (alcohol).

In future, please do not undertake mass reversions of this kind without discussing them first on the talk page. Doing so contravenes good editing practice and, in this case, WP:Popular culture as well. Wahrmund (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your second reversion of this content. The citations are inherent in the entries themselves, which contain links that are primary sources for them. Furthermore, you have deleted a complete bibliographic citation of the book Lake Wobegon Days. Wahrmund (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

White Russian

Stop leaving warnings for me on my talk page and reverting my edits. Only unsourced contentious material or quotes should be removed from articles. This is neither plus the version you're reverting to is unsourced as well. 208.54.35.33 (talk) 20:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

origin of 'white' and 'russian' http://www.bootsnall.com/articles/08-10/10-famous-cocktails-and-where-they-were-born.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikitian (talk • contribs) 17:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Films

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Films? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Erik (talk | contribs) 20:28, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amityville edits

The edit you made to The 2005 Amityville Horror page was in good faith but was clarified information. The difference between the film,book, and true story are verified and well know. They show the difference between each interpretaion. Ex.The house does not look like the real one at all. Obviously it doesnt so that is already clarified. Although, they do need more refs They are clarified and are information to show the differences. --Darkness2light (talk) 13:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not it is "well known" is irrelevant. If it isn't cited, then it's original research, and it stays out. BLGM5 (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary

you should probably be aware that you can be blocked for making offensive summaries, and mis-using the tw utility for retaliation. --emerson7 02:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]