Jump to content

User talk:Hagerman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hagerman (talk | contribs) at 20:42, 20 December 2010 (→Media Studies /Mickey Mouse degrees: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Barack Obama

Its not vandalism, Its true, and it keeps in line with many other bios that have birthnames one them. (http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Story?id=3082803&page=1)

Barry was his nickname, not his birthname. Hagerman(talk) 04:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake, sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dittlelifferent (talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Hagerman, I see that you placed something on my page about an editing war on the Jack Graham page - I agree, and have asked DirkMavs to discuss the subject instead of arbitrarily editing out information (he doesn't provide a reason for his deletion) Additionally, he placed personal information about my family on this history page. His conduct is not civil according to wiki standards. Would you please help me on this? My comments on Graham's page should remain unless someone has good reason to remove them, not just because someone doesn't like them.Doublet89 (talk) 04:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editors who find themselves on the verge of 3RR violations have several options to avoid engaging in such an edit war. These options include discussing the subject on the article Talk page, requesting a third opinion or comment on the article, or one of the many other methods of dispute resolution. Best, Hagerman(talk) 04:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Welcome back! Glad to have you around again! WODUP 05:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Hagerman(talk) 05:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Pleasant surprise. Enigma message 01:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just saw your name: welcome back. Acalamari 20:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks everyone :) Hagerman(talk) 00:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um...

...technically, that's his page, so he can't really vandalise it. Besides, I've already SDed it as an attack page, so... HalfShadow 02:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, looks like a bug (or perhaps a misfeature) with huggle. It gave me the option to put a speedy delete tag on the page instead when it noticed he created the page, but I noticed you already placed the tag there, so I hit no, assuming it would not do anything. But it did the warning anyway... Let me pull that off his page. Best, Hagerman(talk) 02:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hell, some days I can beat bots to the punch. HalfShadow 03:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Haha :). Hagerman(talk) 03:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shockwave photo

Howdy, I'm preparing to redo/update the Kings Dominion page, and wanted to know if I could use your photo of Shockwave on it. It looks like the license you've given it permits use on the Kings Dominion page, but I've been hassled by photo authors before so I wanted to make sure it's okay. Actually, if you don't mind, I'd like to put it on the "Stand-up coaster" and "TOGO" (the manufacturer of the ride) pages as well. Let me know! —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigThunderMtn (talk • contribs) 23:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! :) Hagerman(talk) 03:37, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For fighting vandalism. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 20:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Extreme quality assurance

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Extreme quality assurance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:Notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ismarc (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:KingsIsland.png

Thank you for uploading File:KingsIsland.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spartaz Humbug! 05:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please make your bot add actual signatures

Adding names to unsigned posts means nothing. You should mention they didn't sign by themselves and add the date and time. In other words, please use {{unsigned}} to sign unsigned posts! -79.180.25.233 (talk) 23:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know. --Mkativerata (talk) 04:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Hagerman(talk) 13:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks! Hagerman(talk) 18:27, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Media Studies /Mickey Mouse degrees

I don't see why it wouldn't be constructive. I arrived at the Media Studies page through a link in Mickey Mouse degrees. Since Media Studies is considered a Mickey Mouse degree I dont see why it shouldnt be linked in the "See also" section. --201.163.216.104 (talk) 20:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. It seemed like vandalism at first glance, however, upon further investigation, I see your point. I've reverted my change. Thanks for letting me know! Best, Hagerman(talk) 20:42, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hagerman&oldid=403408475"