Jump to content

User talk:Pantergraph

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pantergraph (talk | contribs) at 17:44, 30 December 2010 (Signing is required). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

License tagging for File:Amiga-90sLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Amiga-90sLogo.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pantergraph, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! methecooldude Contact 18:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PET INVADERS.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PET INVADERS.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shadowed Soul 18:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:21, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When a program has nothing surprising to say, it should say nothing.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to IBM PC compatible has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a blog. It's has poor editing like a blog. Sounds like a blog to me. - Denimadept (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Denimadept, you are right about the poor editing; that is my old web site. The content created by me is not a reliable source. I added a real reference about the influence of Byte magazine. -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy port

One, two, three, four *: WP:3RR ¦ Reisio (talk) 15:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again. ¦ Reisio (talk) 18:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Here at Wikipedia, we have a thing called the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. In short, this means that we encourage people to be bold in making edits, but if someone disagrees and reverts those edits then the correct course of action is to begin a discussion, not to continue to revert back and forth. I have started a discussion about your edit at Talk:SNES#Discussion needed per WP:BRD, let's try to reach a consensus. Thanks. Anomie 21:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your posts

Please sign your posts on talkpages. gu1dry • ¢  00:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bot will do it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pantergraph (talkcontribs) 03:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After some total edit count (which I don't know the number), the bot won't do it anymore. Please get in the habit of typing the four tildes after any talk page post. Thank you! ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots04:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
800 edits. Pantergraph has 851 now, according to the API. Which explains the lack of bot-signing above. Anomie 04:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Metacity

I only rated "pseudo-clever"? Ah well. Marnanel (talk) 13:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

it's almost as if you had invented a recursive acronym
Why do you continue to refuse to sign your posts? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots14:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've raised this general question at WP:ANI, as I myself don't know what the rule is, if any. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots14:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signing is required

As noted here:[1]Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots14:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pantergraph, on talk pages, it is necessary to see who has made what comment, hence contributors are requested to sign. Everyone forgets to sign from time to time. The community accepts this, that's why we have the bots (which are not perfect, and don't sign every unsigned contribution). Deliberately refusing to sign however may be considered disruptive behaviour, as it may appear that you are trying to conceal your ownership of comments on discussion pages. Please get into the habit of signing texts. Thanks for your co-operation. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might consider going back to your recent posts to talk pages (click here to see the list) and add your signature to your posts. You most recent 14 such posts (I didn't look further) all lack your signature. JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. no it isn't necessary to know who made what comment, the content stands on its own; that's the very point of a site like this.
  2. if the bot is broken it should be fixed.
  3. not signing edits is a very bad way of concealing authorship, since it's recorded in the edit history.
  4. i don't "own" my comments, that's childish.
  5. it's probably a good idea to spend some of the fundraising money on buying the pedia.org domain since this site has nothing in common with a wiki and has become more like a freeform forum site.