User talk:I42

This is I42's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 5 days

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

Speedy deletion

A bit too fast, I think. There was a terrible Goodram article, which I redirected here. Wilk may not be the biggest producer but it is in Central Europe. I will improve the article gradually, but not everything at once. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anotherdisc (talk • contribs) 08:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I did not tag the article for speedy deletion; I removed the tag placed by another editor. I42 (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rural Industries LTD

Hey. I'm going to re-instate my A7 tag, as it is not invalid. The IP address is obviously the editor who created the article, and so was never allowed to remove your G11 tag in the first place. If this is a problem, please let me know on my talkpage. -- Lear's Fool 12:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, you've already fixed it. Thanks! -- Lear's Fool 12:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prone Cycle

Bite me--Degen Earthfast (talk) 22:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Oak Ridge Elementary

Hello I42. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Oak Ridge Elementary, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. Nancy ^talk 09:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Colonel Warden RFC

I42, I have reverted your edit, as BrownHairedGirl made it clear that she was not endorsing your view because of the last sentence. I wonder if you'd consider striking that sentence, which was a problem for other editors besides BHG. Kanguole 15:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BHG wrote '#:' at the start of her comment rather than just a '#'. Because there was the # (to number it) I suspect it was intended to be numbered but I understand why you reverted it. It is true that most people who responded to my view do not agree with the last sentence but it was crucial to the point I was trying to make, so I do not wish to strike it. The problem is, CW has been asked over and over again, over a great period of time, to work collaboratively and he has ignored this and all advice offered to him. I think it is beyond the point of no return - even though his intention may be good his impact is negative and Wikipedia would be better off if he found another outlet for his talents. Although this may be harsh, it is in the best interest of the project as a whole. I42 (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Writing '#:' is a common way of striking a vote in a numbered list, used across Wikipedia project pages. If she'd written '::', it would have messed up the numbering.

As for that sentence, I agree with the others that a ban is premature, but of course it's your view to phrase as you please. Kanguole 17:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy or Undelete Page

I nominate and or request that Chris Daniel be undeleted as it is not in violation of G11 but rather is identical to other existing pages such as Pat Lykos. The template come from her page. This article is factual in all aspects and has been properly reference. as an FYI, Harris County is the 3rd largest county in the US and the Largest in TX. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harris DC (talk • contribs) 04:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From the obviously gushing terms such as "has dedicated his professional career to public service" and "Chris Daniel oversaw record growth" to the overall positive tone of the article as a whole, this article goes beyond being merely non-neutral and clearly meets speedy G11 requirements: "it does nothing but promote some entity, person or product and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic". I42 (talk) 08:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]