Jump to content

User talk:Deely

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Antoshi (talk | contribs) at 16:48, 3 September 2011 (Your view on Wikipedia: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hey guys. Feel free to leave me a message, but please respecting WP:CIVIL

Welcome back

Welcome back to Wikipedia. I trust that you were sincere in your unblock request and that you will contribute constructively to Wikipedia in the future. I don't know what your interests are, but there's probably a WikiProject covering them. If you haven't already done so, join a WikiProject, find out what issues the project has flagged up and do what you can to fix them. Best, Mjroots (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PJ would be a good place to start. Otherwise, find an article on a subject that interests you and look on talk page to see which Wikiprojects it is tagged with. Mjroots (talk) 13:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your post on user_talk:3bulletproof16, as you see from my post just above yours, I withdrew the accusation. I do admit it was based on behavioral evidence, but when I looked closer I did not believe you and the user in question were the same person. Hazardous Matt (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it stays that way. By the way sorry for answering so late I don't go on much. Deely1 01:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're under no obligation to answer me. I had your talk page on my watchlist waiting for any response. I want you to know that in an act of good faith, I'm taking it off my watchlist so you can go about and do what you need to do. I hope you find some good projects. Hazardous Matt (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Matt. Deely1 21:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your post on WT:PW. I did notice something odd, which is your signature links to Kalajan, not Deely. That needs to be updated. It causes problems with plugins like Twinkle. Hazardous Matt (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thanks for pointing that out mate. Deely1 13:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Message

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. 23:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff

If you want to write about the Corre or whatever wrestlers,, Best take references from:

First priority: pwtorch.com / f4wonline.com / slam.canoe.ca / onlineworldofwrestling.com
Second priority: wwe.com / cagematch.de / wrestleview.com

Do a google search "site:pwtorch.com The Corre" to find articles Starship.paint (talk) 03:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a dozen mate. Is pwtorch actually reliable? I thought it was, but I was wondering since some guy commented on the deletion page for The Corre saying it wasn't. Deely1 03:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it is! Many articles rely on PWTorch for articles on events. See this, PWTorch is clearly listed there. Starship.paint (talk) 05:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Corre

I'm going to work on this, going to add references. Do you know how to properly cite a references? When you edit, look at the top of the box. You'll see Advanced; Special characters; Help; Cite

Click Cite, then Templates, then cite web. Then fill in the forms listed there. It's not that hard. Any questions? Starship.paint (talk) 05:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I do know how to, thanks for your help though. I'll help you on the article. Deely1 13:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your view on Wikipedia

It's definitely skewed. You're unaware of the policies and guidelines of the site, how establishing notability and citing reliable sources works. Every time you reply to one of my comments, you continually show your naivete to the entire point of Wikipedia. "Alright then Antoshi how about this. You delete all the references, find them yourself and tell us that the article is now notable enough." That's not how it works. I'm not supposed to do your job for you. Personally, I don't mind if the article stays or goes. But the point is to adhere to the rules. You can't simply say "Yeah the group is notable" and making other claims without actual, written proof in the form of reliable sources. I see that you've been here for almost 4 years, and have been blocked at least once. For someone who's been around for so long, I really would expect more. But you need to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies. ☆ Antoshi ☆ T | C 16:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]