Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx
Padmalakshmisx
- Padmalakshmisx (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
13 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Eeenadu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Obvious sock is obvious; specifically compare the edits of Eeenadu and the most recent sock, User:Dragonbooster4. Same attempt to dominate Hyderabad, India; there's also some WP:BEANS stuff that you can probably spot but I can point out off-wiki if needed; look specifically at the edit summaries and the discussion on Talk:Hyderabad, India. Editor also started editing 9 days after DB4 was blocked. Since the last CU turned up several sleepers, I recommend yet another sleeper check here. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Was on my to-do list by Q beat me to it. We've had a few rangeblocks from prior SPIs, I don't know if they expired (the one that I did expired a while back) or he just jumped ranges. A longer term rangeblock might be helpful if there isn't any significant collateral damage. —SpacemanSpiff 13:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Not a Sock
whether i get blocked or not is a secondary issue. the other editor omer123hussain is being very disruptive on this article - Hyderabad check his edit history and my edit history and behavior also again that editor, reverts ur edits, then u will acecpt it??? All my contributions were constructive and neutral I did not demand my way, more agressive was this other user, u see how i made consensus on hyderabad talk page As far as I know I did not dominate Hyderabad article with my views like the other sock puppet. further, this user omer123hussain, anways will revert it. my suggestions to admin MikeWazowski is please protect hyderabad article, after reverting the image from Raj bhavan road to Abids shopping center
(Eeenadu (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).
- You just don't get it: you don't get to form a consensus. You are indefinitely blocked. It means you cannot edit here, period. And, also, pages are never protected and kept in a single way indefinitely; full protection is only a temporary thing to force discussion. Finally, why won't you understand: if you are blocked, you are blocked. You cannot edit Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if your edits are kind, benign, reverting vandalism, or per consensus: blocked means blocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I wasnt blocked, I was a suspected sock, which I am not, I have no idea who the other user was, u please check the hyderabad article edit history, revision history and discussion page. I was new to wikipedia (Eeenadu (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).