Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx
Padmalakshmisx
- Padmalakshmisx (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
13 September 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Eeenadu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Not a sock:
Reason below:
I did not dominate hyderabad article,
which attempt of mine shows I am into dominating the article, please check hyderabad article page and look at the way I came to Consensus with other aggressive user omer123hussain, may be he is a sock puppet (Eeenadu (talk) 14:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eeenadu (talk • contribs) 14:24, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
whether i get blocked or not is a secondary issue. the other editor omer123hussain is being very disruptive on this article - Hyderabad check his edit history and my edit history and behavior also again that editor, reverts ur edits, then u will acecpt it??? All my contributions were constructive and neutral I did not demand my way, more agressive was this other user, u see how i made consensus on hyderabad talk page As far as I know I did not dominate Hyderabad article with my views like the other sock puppet. further, this user omer123hussain, anways will revert it. my suggestions to admin MikeWazowski is please protect hyderabad article, after reverting the image from Raj bhavan road to Abids shopping center
the user mikewazowski undid the image i replaced to raj bhavan road he suspects I am a sock, but I reached consensus, the other user omer123hussain was aggressive in his approach and not me.
I wasnt blocked, I was a suspected sock, which I am not, I have no idea who the other user was, u please check the hyderabad article edit history, revision history and discussion page. I am new to wikipedia
(Eeenadu (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Obvious sock is obvious; specifically compare the edits of Eeenadu and the most recent sock, User:Dragonbooster4. Same attempt to dominate Hyderabad, India; there's also some WP:BEANS stuff that you can probably spot but I can point out off-wiki if needed; look specifically at the edit summaries and the discussion on Talk:Hyderabad, India. Editor also started editing 9 days after DB4 was blocked. Since the last CU turned up several sleepers, I recommend yet another sleeper check here. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Was on my to-do list by Q beat me to it. We've had a few rangeblocks from prior SPIs, I don't know if they expired (the one that I did expired a while back) or he just jumped ranges. A longer term rangeblock might be helpful if there isn't any significant collateral damage. —SpacemanSpiff 13:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Not a Sock
whether i get blocked or not is a secondary issue. the other editor omer123hussain is being very disruptive on this article - Hyderabad check his edit history and my edit history and behavior also again that editor, reverts ur edits, then u will acecpt it??? All my contributions were constructive and neutral I did not demand my way, more agressive was this other user, u see how i made consensus on hyderabad talk page As far as I know I did not dominate Hyderabad article with my views like the other sock puppet. further, this user omer123hussain, anways will revert it. my suggestions to admin MikeWazowski is please protect hyderabad article, after reverting the image from Raj bhavan road to Abids shopping center
(Eeenadu (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).
- You just don't get it: you don't get to form a consensus. You are indefinitely blocked. It means you cannot edit here, period. And, also, pages are never protected and kept in a single way indefinitely; full protection is only a temporary thing to force discussion. Finally, why won't you understand: if you are blocked, you are blocked. You cannot edit Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if your edits are kind, benign, reverting vandalism, or per consensus: blocked means blocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I wasnt blocked, I was a suspected sock, which I am not, I have no idea who the other user was, u please check the hyderabad article edit history, revision history and discussion page. I was new to wikipedia (Eeenadu (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).
- You are a suspected sock right now. I'm almost ready just to WP:DUCK block you, but I'm patient enough to wait for a CU. If it finds you even somewhat likely, then you should definitely be blocked. And, in fact, checking all of that edit history is what convinces me, completely, that you are the same person as Dragonbooster4. Are you saying that you are not Dragonbooster4? Qwyrxian (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Here's an interesting question--how did you find out about this sockpuppet investigation? How did you know where to look? I didn't notify you on purpose, which is explicitly allowed per SPI rules. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Never mind, I see it was mentioned on the article's talk page. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes I am not dragonboosetr for sure, it was user omer123hussain, demanded his own way, not me u check his approach towards fellow editors and speak, I was the one who insisted him not to be disruptive in his edits the revision history page and discussion page of Hyderabad article. I think u should take ur case back. further, I am into editing with neutral statements, you check my other edits and edit summaries in other articles. You also check with user omer123hussain. edit habits and then use judgement.
(Eeenadu (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).
Not a sock, why because I am actually not resisting to mikewazowski's edits
- to undo my edits, but the edit I undid now was initially not accepted by me
- the edits of urs I undid was not my view, my view initially was to retain raj bhavan road
- but after going through consensus, I replaced images as per consensus with omer123hussain
I am just confused
(Eeenadu (talk) 14:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).