Jump to content

User talk:Fluffernutter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Billim1 (talk | contribs) at 02:45, 13 November 2011 (Billim1: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nice restful job for you :o)

The Meermin slave mutiny. Pesky (talkstalk!) 23:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting blocks

The block you placed here conflicts with another block placed there less than a minute beforehand. Your's is indefinite, while the other is for 31 hours. One of the blocks should be removed. SMP0328. (talk) 03:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you, I noticed that right after it went through. Should be fixed now. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UWTEST members update

Hi, you're getting this message because you signed up to receive updates at WP:UWTEST, the task force on testing of user warnings and other notifications.

Here's what we're up to lately:

  • Huggle: There are tests still running in Huggle of level 1 templates, including a new template written by DGG. A full list is available here
  • SDPatrolBot: There is a new test running on the talk page messages of SDPatrolBot, which warns people who remove CSD templates. (Documentation of the test is here.)
  • Twinkle: We've proposed a test of AFD and PROD notifications delivered via Twinkle, which has been positively received. (See: 1, 2) This test should start this week.
  • Shared and dynamic IPs: Maryana's proposal to test the effect of regularly archiving shared/dynamic IP talk pages is in its final stages. There are also two relevant bot flag requests: 1, 2
  • XLinkBot: the herders of XLinkBot have approved a test of its warning messages concerning external links. Test templates are being written and help is most welcome.

Thanks for your help and support, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 02:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

For the heads up on the spam. I am not sure why it gets popular for people to hijack examples once a month, but they do. Science 2.0 (talk) 18:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block settings for Proofplus

Given that Proofplus (talk · contribs) has apparently mass-emailed several users (I'm one), did you mean to leave her ability to email other users, or were you going to revoke that as well? —C.Fred (talk) 23:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been pondering that. I wasn't sure if it was only me he hit, so initially I left it talkpage-only. Since its multiple people, though, I'll go adjust the block. Thanks for letting me know! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Billim1

Sorry...